Djingis (?) Khan1
M, #66211, b. circa 1162, d. 1227
Last Edited | 27 Sep 2004 |
Djingis (?) Khan was born circa 1162.2
Djingis (?) Khan died in 1227.1
; EARLY YEARS
Genghis Khan, or Ghengis Khan as he is more widely known, was born about the year 1162 to a Mongol chieftain, Yesugei, and his wife. He was born with the name of Temujin which means ’iron worker’ in his native language. When Temujin was born his fist was clutching a blood clot which was declared an omen that he was destined to become a heroic warrior.
Very little is known of Temujin until he was around age 13 when his father declared that his son was to find a fiancée and get married. After several days of travel Temujin and Yesugei came across a tribe of Mongols that were very hospitable and welcoming. Temujin was not there long when he noticed a certain girl, Bortei the daughter of the chieftain. She was destined to become his wife.
Temüjin's father died when Temüjin was still young, poisoned by a group of Tatars. The Tatars were the chief power on the eastern Mongolian steppe at the time, and long- time rivals of the Mongols. When Temujin heard how his father had died, vowed one day to revenge the death.
Temujin left Bortei , returned to his tribe, with the intention to declare himself leader. At this time he was 13 years of age. Senior members of the tribe ridiculed his plans; rejected him as chief, and abandoned the youngster and his family to the Mongolian plains. While there were noble lineages among the Mongols, such as Temüjin's, they did not enjoy the automatic loyalty of others on the steppe. Nor did seniority guarantee a position of influence or power. Leadership seems to have often been a more informal institution, open to those with the right to contest for it. As a result of this rejection, Temujin extended his vengeful intentions to his own clan members.
Life was very hard for the family. It is related that when Temujin discovered his own brother stealing food from the group had no hesitation in killing him. News that he was a stern leader that would kill his own brother to keep order became widely known.
On a hunting trip he was ambushed by an enemy tribe and taken prisoner. While prisoner he killed his guard and escaped. The enemy searched, but excellent survival skills kept him alive until he could meet up with his own tribe. This act of courage spread his name to all parts of the Mongolian plains. Shortly after, another raid by strangers left the family with one horse and very little food. Temujin took chase but could not catch them. During his chase he met up with Bogurchi, the son of a rich man, who would become a blood- brother and trusted ally. Bogurchi helped Temujin retrieve the stolen horses but the thieves escaped. Word of these exploits became greatly exaggerated to thus enhance his reputation even further.
After four years, the time had come to marry Bortei. As a wedding present her father gave him a very rare black sable fur. This gift proved to be one of the most important assets ever given to Temujin. Temujin used it to persuade Togrul, his fathers sworn-brother, to join him in revenge attacks against the Tatars and other Mongol enemies. Togrul agreed to join and reconcile all of Temujin's fathers men.
EARLY CONQUESTS
Temujin was now aged seventeen. Already his road to glory had begun. Word of Temujin and Togrul spread far and wide. They called all Mongols to unite and defeat their enemies. Thousands of people came bringing weapons, food, and families. Temujin now had thousands of people under his command.
The army became highly organised. They were divided into groups of tens, hundreds, thousands, and ten thousands. Each soldier carried his own food which usually consisted of powdered yak milk and dried milk and when food was scarce the soldiers would open up a vein of their horse to drink its blood.
becomes ‘GHENGIS KHAN’
In 1183 the Mongols that gathered declared Temujin their great Khan, giving him the name Genghis. At this time, he was still a junior member of the lineage, and his election is thus somewhat of a surprise. It may well have been an attempt by senior members of the lineage to install a Khan they thought they could control. This political maneuvering was not spectacularly successful.
The meaning of Genghis, or Ghengis, is widely debated. Some say it means "precious warrior", others indicate "spirit of light". In any case, it meant power for Genghis and an empire to command. Ghengis is credited with the creation of the Ih Zasag (‘ the Great Law’, usually rendered into English as "The Great Yasa".) Although portrayed as a codified set of laws, this is debatable. Some scholars have suggested that the Ih Zasag was in fact a codification of existing steppe customs.
Despite Temujin being declared Khan, the Mongol people were not completely united into one entity. It took several campaigns to consolidate his position. The Keraits were led by a boyhood friend of Genghis's called Jamuga. Genghis offered Jamuga the change to surrender. This offer was declined and several great battles resulted. The first in 1201 nearly destroyed all Jamuga's forces; with the final destruction of the Kerait army in 1203. Jamuga asked to be put to death without his blood being spilled. Genghis honored his old friend by having him beaten and suffocated between two felt blankets without spilling blood. The last rogue Mongol clan was defeated in 1204.
"The greatest happiness is
to vanquish your enemies,
to chase them before you,
to rob them of their wealth,
to see those dear to them
bathed in tears, to clasp to
your bosom their wives
and daughters"
-GENGHIS KHAN
‘KHAN of KHANS’
It was not until 1206 that Genghis was named Khan of Khans or King of Kings and king of ‘all people who lived in felt tents’. With all of the Mongol tribes united and under his control he could now concentrate his forces on expanding his empire.
In 1207 he began a crusade to conquer the lands of China. At that time China was divided into three separate empires. They were the Qin, Tangut empires in the north and the Sung Empire in the South. He himself led battles against the Tangut state in what is now present day Xinjiang (northwest China), and the Qin in northern China, taking Peking in 1215. However, although most of northern China was under Mongol control Genghis's dream to dominate all Chinese territory would be achieved but occur until the reign his grandson Kublai Khan in 1279.
With northern China under his control he now turned his attention westward. In 1218, the Khwarazm (modern Uzbekistan) Shah, Mohammed II, slaughtered a Mongolian caravan and a following delegation of ambassadors. This precipitated Chinghis's attacks on Central Asia, although in any case it may well have been merely a matter of time before he attacked. Genghis sent a message to their leader Shah Mohammed, saying that the governor must be turned over to the Mongols or war would be declared on Kwarezm.
The Kwarezm Empire refused and war was declared. Genghis led an attack force of 90,000 men from the north and he sent a general with 30,000 men to attack from the east. Despite this large army he was outnumbered by the Shah's army more than 400,000 men. Genghis's army was victorious, allowing a full scale invasion and occupation of the Kwarezm Empire. From this campaign the Mongols acquired the knowledge of the "fire that flies", burning arrows. And with subsequent victories new methods of warfare were used to made his armies stronger and more deadly.
An army of 20,000 was then sent toward Russia. In 1223 that group of 20,000 Mongol warrior's devastated a Russian army of 80,000. This was the beginning of what would become known in Russian history as the ‘Tatar Yoke.’ Events which influenced the Russian empire until present times. The Mongols quickly fought there way through Russia and into Europe. Their armies destroyed entire cities in Russia, Hungary and Poland leaving devastation in their wake.
the DEATH of GHENGIS
In 1227, Genghis Khan, a master horse rider fell from his horse during a hunt. He was severely injured and died shortly after.
With Heaven's aid I have conquered for you a huge empire.
But my life was too short to achieve the conquest of the world. That is left for you.
--Genghis Khan, to his sons at the end of his life
His body was taken back to his birthplace, northeast of Ulaanbaatar. According to legend, anyone meeting the funeral procession was killed, so no one would know of Ghengis's death. The cart carrying his body is said to have bogged down in the Ordos region of China, and only began moving again after the prayers to his spirit by one of his followers not to abandon his people. As a result, however, a shrine was built in the Ordos region. A herd of horses was said to have been driven back and forth over his grave in Hentei to obscure it, and soldiers were posted until trees grew over the area. To this day, however it is not really known where the ruler of the world’s largest empire is actually buried.
Upon his death the main expansionist phase of Mongol conquest ended as the armies returned home to elect a new Khan. The vast empire, now came under the banner of his son Ogadai. It was divided into three, with each region controlled by another son of Ghengis.
top of page
the ACCOMPLISHMENTS
While normally thought of as a despot Ghengis Khan was also generous and loyal. A highly charismatic man, he nonetheless also expected loyalty from everyone, including those who served his opponents. He is reputed to have put to death people who, thinking they would gain his good graces, betrayed their lords to him.
In the West, it is usually Ghengis's brilliance as a military commander that is dwelt upon. And indeed, this attention is deserved. It should be noted, however, that certain misconceptions appear to linger concerning the Mongols. They did not, in fact, invent the tactics they used with such effectiveness against their enemies, such as the feigned retreat. Rather, they brought to a new level old steppe nomad military tactics. Even Ghengis's much vaunted organization of the military on a decimal system was to be found among the Xiong-nu, although arranging it to cut across lineages, and thus ensure greatly loyalty to the leader, apparently was an innovation.
Innovative too, was Ghengis's tendency to pluck people from the ranks. Although noble birth may well have given one a headstart, one could only be assured of advancement through the ranks based on ability and loyalty. In present-day Mongolia, it is not so much his military attributes that are emphasized, but rather his administrative abilities.
One should further be aware that although we talk of the "Mongol" army, the reality is more complicated. The commanders were indeed "Mongol" (even defining Mongol in this context can be tricky), but the soldiers were drawn from allies and conquered areas. Engineers from conquered sedentary populations were put into action as siege experts, and even the cavalry was a mixture of Mongol and other nomadic groups.
The success of the Mongol conquests should also be attributed at least in part to two other factors. One was military intelligence. The Mongols had a extensive network of spies and usually had extensive information of an enemy before they engaged them in battle. The other was their use of psychological warfare. Much is made of the total destruction of cities in Central Asia by the Mongols. What is normally overlooked, however, is that this was more of an exception than a rule. If a city capitulated, Ghengis Khan was usually content to let them be, once their defences had been pulled down. Only those who resisted faced the sword. This not only wiped out resistance, but more importantly, word quickly spread of the wrath of Ghengis Khan, and many peoples found it easier to submit than to resist.
All who surrender will be spared;
whoever does not surrender but opposes with struggle and dissension,
shall be annihilated.
--Genghis Khan
In short, although the Mongol successes may appear astounding, they are explainable by ordinary means. One need not look for some mystical explanation. Indeed, to do so does a disservice to the true talents of Ghengis Khan and the Mongols of the thirteenth century.
Copyright © Footprints Tours Ltd
Programming & design by Green Kiwi Ltd
Last updated: 18Mar,2001.2 Djingis (?) Khan was also known as Ghengis (?) Khan.
Djingis (?) Khan died in 1227.1
; EARLY YEARS
Genghis Khan, or Ghengis Khan as he is more widely known, was born about the year 1162 to a Mongol chieftain, Yesugei, and his wife. He was born with the name of Temujin which means ’iron worker’ in his native language. When Temujin was born his fist was clutching a blood clot which was declared an omen that he was destined to become a heroic warrior.
Very little is known of Temujin until he was around age 13 when his father declared that his son was to find a fiancée and get married. After several days of travel Temujin and Yesugei came across a tribe of Mongols that were very hospitable and welcoming. Temujin was not there long when he noticed a certain girl, Bortei the daughter of the chieftain. She was destined to become his wife.
Temüjin's father died when Temüjin was still young, poisoned by a group of Tatars. The Tatars were the chief power on the eastern Mongolian steppe at the time, and long- time rivals of the Mongols. When Temujin heard how his father had died, vowed one day to revenge the death.
Temujin left Bortei , returned to his tribe, with the intention to declare himself leader. At this time he was 13 years of age. Senior members of the tribe ridiculed his plans; rejected him as chief, and abandoned the youngster and his family to the Mongolian plains. While there were noble lineages among the Mongols, such as Temüjin's, they did not enjoy the automatic loyalty of others on the steppe. Nor did seniority guarantee a position of influence or power. Leadership seems to have often been a more informal institution, open to those with the right to contest for it. As a result of this rejection, Temujin extended his vengeful intentions to his own clan members.
Life was very hard for the family. It is related that when Temujin discovered his own brother stealing food from the group had no hesitation in killing him. News that he was a stern leader that would kill his own brother to keep order became widely known.
On a hunting trip he was ambushed by an enemy tribe and taken prisoner. While prisoner he killed his guard and escaped. The enemy searched, but excellent survival skills kept him alive until he could meet up with his own tribe. This act of courage spread his name to all parts of the Mongolian plains. Shortly after, another raid by strangers left the family with one horse and very little food. Temujin took chase but could not catch them. During his chase he met up with Bogurchi, the son of a rich man, who would become a blood- brother and trusted ally. Bogurchi helped Temujin retrieve the stolen horses but the thieves escaped. Word of these exploits became greatly exaggerated to thus enhance his reputation even further.
After four years, the time had come to marry Bortei. As a wedding present her father gave him a very rare black sable fur. This gift proved to be one of the most important assets ever given to Temujin. Temujin used it to persuade Togrul, his fathers sworn-brother, to join him in revenge attacks against the Tatars and other Mongol enemies. Togrul agreed to join and reconcile all of Temujin's fathers men.
EARLY CONQUESTS
Temujin was now aged seventeen. Already his road to glory had begun. Word of Temujin and Togrul spread far and wide. They called all Mongols to unite and defeat their enemies. Thousands of people came bringing weapons, food, and families. Temujin now had thousands of people under his command.
The army became highly organised. They were divided into groups of tens, hundreds, thousands, and ten thousands. Each soldier carried his own food which usually consisted of powdered yak milk and dried milk and when food was scarce the soldiers would open up a vein of their horse to drink its blood.
becomes ‘GHENGIS KHAN’
In 1183 the Mongols that gathered declared Temujin their great Khan, giving him the name Genghis. At this time, he was still a junior member of the lineage, and his election is thus somewhat of a surprise. It may well have been an attempt by senior members of the lineage to install a Khan they thought they could control. This political maneuvering was not spectacularly successful.
The meaning of Genghis, or Ghengis, is widely debated. Some say it means "precious warrior", others indicate "spirit of light". In any case, it meant power for Genghis and an empire to command. Ghengis is credited with the creation of the Ih Zasag (‘ the Great Law’, usually rendered into English as "The Great Yasa".) Although portrayed as a codified set of laws, this is debatable. Some scholars have suggested that the Ih Zasag was in fact a codification of existing steppe customs.
Despite Temujin being declared Khan, the Mongol people were not completely united into one entity. It took several campaigns to consolidate his position. The Keraits were led by a boyhood friend of Genghis's called Jamuga. Genghis offered Jamuga the change to surrender. This offer was declined and several great battles resulted. The first in 1201 nearly destroyed all Jamuga's forces; with the final destruction of the Kerait army in 1203. Jamuga asked to be put to death without his blood being spilled. Genghis honored his old friend by having him beaten and suffocated between two felt blankets without spilling blood. The last rogue Mongol clan was defeated in 1204.
"The greatest happiness is
to vanquish your enemies,
to chase them before you,
to rob them of their wealth,
to see those dear to them
bathed in tears, to clasp to
your bosom their wives
and daughters"
-GENGHIS KHAN
‘KHAN of KHANS’
It was not until 1206 that Genghis was named Khan of Khans or King of Kings and king of ‘all people who lived in felt tents’. With all of the Mongol tribes united and under his control he could now concentrate his forces on expanding his empire.
In 1207 he began a crusade to conquer the lands of China. At that time China was divided into three separate empires. They were the Qin, Tangut empires in the north and the Sung Empire in the South. He himself led battles against the Tangut state in what is now present day Xinjiang (northwest China), and the Qin in northern China, taking Peking in 1215. However, although most of northern China was under Mongol control Genghis's dream to dominate all Chinese territory would be achieved but occur until the reign his grandson Kublai Khan in 1279.
With northern China under his control he now turned his attention westward. In 1218, the Khwarazm (modern Uzbekistan) Shah, Mohammed II, slaughtered a Mongolian caravan and a following delegation of ambassadors. This precipitated Chinghis's attacks on Central Asia, although in any case it may well have been merely a matter of time before he attacked. Genghis sent a message to their leader Shah Mohammed, saying that the governor must be turned over to the Mongols or war would be declared on Kwarezm.
The Kwarezm Empire refused and war was declared. Genghis led an attack force of 90,000 men from the north and he sent a general with 30,000 men to attack from the east. Despite this large army he was outnumbered by the Shah's army more than 400,000 men. Genghis's army was victorious, allowing a full scale invasion and occupation of the Kwarezm Empire. From this campaign the Mongols acquired the knowledge of the "fire that flies", burning arrows. And with subsequent victories new methods of warfare were used to made his armies stronger and more deadly.
An army of 20,000 was then sent toward Russia. In 1223 that group of 20,000 Mongol warrior's devastated a Russian army of 80,000. This was the beginning of what would become known in Russian history as the ‘Tatar Yoke.’ Events which influenced the Russian empire until present times. The Mongols quickly fought there way through Russia and into Europe. Their armies destroyed entire cities in Russia, Hungary and Poland leaving devastation in their wake.
the DEATH of GHENGIS
In 1227, Genghis Khan, a master horse rider fell from his horse during a hunt. He was severely injured and died shortly after.
With Heaven's aid I have conquered for you a huge empire.
But my life was too short to achieve the conquest of the world. That is left for you.
--Genghis Khan, to his sons at the end of his life
His body was taken back to his birthplace, northeast of Ulaanbaatar. According to legend, anyone meeting the funeral procession was killed, so no one would know of Ghengis's death. The cart carrying his body is said to have bogged down in the Ordos region of China, and only began moving again after the prayers to his spirit by one of his followers not to abandon his people. As a result, however, a shrine was built in the Ordos region. A herd of horses was said to have been driven back and forth over his grave in Hentei to obscure it, and soldiers were posted until trees grew over the area. To this day, however it is not really known where the ruler of the world’s largest empire is actually buried.
Upon his death the main expansionist phase of Mongol conquest ended as the armies returned home to elect a new Khan. The vast empire, now came under the banner of his son Ogadai. It was divided into three, with each region controlled by another son of Ghengis.
top of page
the ACCOMPLISHMENTS
While normally thought of as a despot Ghengis Khan was also generous and loyal. A highly charismatic man, he nonetheless also expected loyalty from everyone, including those who served his opponents. He is reputed to have put to death people who, thinking they would gain his good graces, betrayed their lords to him.
In the West, it is usually Ghengis's brilliance as a military commander that is dwelt upon. And indeed, this attention is deserved. It should be noted, however, that certain misconceptions appear to linger concerning the Mongols. They did not, in fact, invent the tactics they used with such effectiveness against their enemies, such as the feigned retreat. Rather, they brought to a new level old steppe nomad military tactics. Even Ghengis's much vaunted organization of the military on a decimal system was to be found among the Xiong-nu, although arranging it to cut across lineages, and thus ensure greatly loyalty to the leader, apparently was an innovation.
Innovative too, was Ghengis's tendency to pluck people from the ranks. Although noble birth may well have given one a headstart, one could only be assured of advancement through the ranks based on ability and loyalty. In present-day Mongolia, it is not so much his military attributes that are emphasized, but rather his administrative abilities.
One should further be aware that although we talk of the "Mongol" army, the reality is more complicated. The commanders were indeed "Mongol" (even defining Mongol in this context can be tricky), but the soldiers were drawn from allies and conquered areas. Engineers from conquered sedentary populations were put into action as siege experts, and even the cavalry was a mixture of Mongol and other nomadic groups.
The success of the Mongol conquests should also be attributed at least in part to two other factors. One was military intelligence. The Mongols had a extensive network of spies and usually had extensive information of an enemy before they engaged them in battle. The other was their use of psychological warfare. Much is made of the total destruction of cities in Central Asia by the Mongols. What is normally overlooked, however, is that this was more of an exception than a rule. If a city capitulated, Ghengis Khan was usually content to let them be, once their defences had been pulled down. Only those who resisted faced the sword. This not only wiped out resistance, but more importantly, word quickly spread of the wrath of Ghengis Khan, and many peoples found it easier to submit than to resist.
All who surrender will be spared;
whoever does not surrender but opposes with struggle and dissension,
shall be annihilated.
--Genghis Khan
In short, although the Mongol successes may appear astounding, they are explainable by ordinary means. One need not look for some mystical explanation. Indeed, to do so does a disservice to the true talents of Ghengis Khan and the Mongols of the thirteenth century.
Copyright © Footprints Tours Ltd
Programming & design by Green Kiwi Ltd
Last updated: 18Mar,2001.2 Djingis (?) Khan was also known as Ghengis (?) Khan.
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XIV (M): The House of the Ilkhans. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S1676] A Personal History of Ghengis Khan: Adapted by Footprints from Various Sources, online http://www.greenkiwi.co.nz/footprints/mongolia/ghengis_history.htm. Hereinafter cited as A Personal History of Ghengis Khan.
Giorgi III (?) King of Georgia1
M, #66212, d. 6 April 1184
Father | Demetre I (?) King of Georgia1 b. 1093, d. 1156 |
Last Edited | 15 Oct 2004 |
Giorgi III (?) King of Georgia married Burudukan (?) of Ossetia circa 1155.1
Giorgi III (?) King of Georgia died on 6 April 1184; buried in Gelati.1
; Giorgi III, King of Georgia (1156-84), +6.4.1184, bur Gelati; m.ca 1155 Burudukan of Ossetia.1 He was King of Georgia between 1156 and 1184.1
Giorgi III (?) King of Georgia died on 6 April 1184; buried in Gelati.1
; Giorgi III, King of Georgia (1156-84), +6.4.1184, bur Gelati; m.ca 1155 Burudukan of Ossetia.1 He was King of Georgia between 1156 and 1184.1
Family | Burudukan (?) of Ossetia |
Children |
|
Citations
- [S1438] Miroslav Marek, online http://genealogy.euweb.cz/index.html, unknown author (e-mail address), downloaded updated 15 May 2003, Bagrat 2 page: http://genealogy.euweb.cz/georgia/bagrat2.html
Burudukan (?) of Ossetia1
F, #66213
Last Edited | 27 Sep 2004 |
Burudukan (?) of Ossetia married Giorgi III (?) King of Georgia, son of Demetre I (?) King of Georgia, circa 1155.1
Family | Giorgi III (?) King of Georgia d. 6 Apr 1184 |
Children |
|
Citations
- [S1438] Miroslav Marek, online http://genealogy.euweb.cz/index.html, unknown author (e-mail address), downloaded updated 15 May 2003, Bagrat 2 page: http://genealogy.euweb.cz/georgia/bagrat2.html
David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia1
M, #66214, b. 1073, d. 24 January 1125
Father | Giorgi II (?) King of Georgia1 d. c 1112 |
Mother | Helena (?)1 |
Last Edited | 27 Sep 2004 |
David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia was born in 1073.1 He married Rusudan (?) of Armenia.1
David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia and Rusudan (?) of Armenia were divorced in 1107.1 David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia married Guranduht (?) of Kipchak in 1118
; his 2nd wife.1
David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia died on 24 January 1125.1
; David IV "the Builder", King of Georgia (1089-1125), *1073, +24.1.1125, bur Gelati; 1m: (div 1107) Rusudan of Armenia; 2m: 1118 Guranduht of Kipchak, granddaughter of Khan Sharukan; all children from.1 He was King of Georgia between 1089 and 1125.1
David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia and Rusudan (?) of Armenia were divorced in 1107.1 David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia married Guranduht (?) of Kipchak in 1118
; his 2nd wife.1
David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia died on 24 January 1125.1
; David IV "the Builder", King of Georgia (1089-1125), *1073, +24.1.1125, bur Gelati; 1m: (div 1107) Rusudan of Armenia; 2m: 1118 Guranduht of Kipchak, granddaughter of Khan Sharukan; all children from.1 He was King of Georgia between 1089 and 1125.1
Family 1 | Rusudan (?) of Armenia |
Child |
|
Family 2 | Guranduht (?) of Kipchak |
Citations
- [S1438] Miroslav Marek, online http://genealogy.euweb.cz/index.html, unknown author (e-mail address), downloaded updated 15 May 2003, Bagrat 2 page: http://genealogy.euweb.cz/georgia/bagrat2.html
Rusudan (?) of Armenia1
F, #66215
Last Edited | 27 Sep 2004 |
Rusudan (?) of Armenia married David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia, son of Giorgi II (?) King of Georgia and Helena (?).1
Rusudan (?) of Armenia and David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia were divorced in 1107.1
Rusudan (?) of Armenia and David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia were divorced in 1107.1
Family | David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia b. 1073, d. 24 Jan 1125 |
Child |
|
Citations
- [S1438] Miroslav Marek, online http://genealogy.euweb.cz/index.html, unknown author (e-mail address), downloaded updated 15 May 2003, Bagrat 2 page: http://genealogy.euweb.cz/georgia/bagrat2.html
Guranduht (?) of Kipchak1
F, #66216
Last Edited | 27 Sep 2004 |
Guranduht (?) of Kipchak married David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia, son of Giorgi II (?) King of Georgia and Helena (?), in 1118
; his 2nd wife.1
; Guranduht of Kipchak, granddaughter of Khan Sharukan.1
; his 2nd wife.1
; Guranduht of Kipchak, granddaughter of Khan Sharukan.1
Family | David IV "the Builder" (?) King of Georgia b. 1073, d. 24 Jan 1125 |
Citations
- [S1438] Miroslav Marek, online http://genealogy.euweb.cz/index.html, unknown author (e-mail address), downloaded updated 15 May 2003, Bagrat 2 page: http://genealogy.euweb.cz/georgia/bagrat2.html
Giorgi II (?) King of Georgia1
M, #66217, d. circa 1112
Father | Bagrat IV (?) King of Georgia1 b. c 1020, d. 1072 |
Mother | Borena (?) of Ossetia1 |
Last Edited | 27 Sep 2004 |
Giorgi II (?) King of Georgia married Helena (?)1
Giorgi II (?) King of Georgia died circa 1112.1
; [2m.] Giorgi II, King of Georgia (1072-89), +ca 1112; m.Helena N.1 He was King of Georgia between 1072 and 1089.1
Giorgi II (?) King of Georgia died circa 1112.1
; [2m.] Giorgi II, King of Georgia (1072-89), +ca 1112; m.Helena N.1 He was King of Georgia between 1072 and 1089.1
Family | Helena (?) |
Child |
|
Citations
- [S1438] Miroslav Marek, online http://genealogy.euweb.cz/index.html, unknown author (e-mail address), downloaded updated 15 May 2003, Bagrat 2 page: http://genealogy.euweb.cz/georgia/bagrat2.html
Helena (?)1
F, #66218
Last Edited | 27 Sep 2004 |
Helena (?) married Giorgi II (?) King of Georgia, son of Bagrat IV (?) King of Georgia and Borena (?) of Ossetia.1
Family | Giorgi II (?) King of Georgia d. c 1112 |
Child |
|
Citations
- [S1438] Miroslav Marek, online http://genealogy.euweb.cz/index.html, unknown author (e-mail address), downloaded updated 15 May 2003, Bagrat 2 page: http://genealogy.euweb.cz/georgia/bagrat2.html
Shah Suleiman (?)1
M, #66219, d. 1042
Father | Ioannes Dukas Comnenus Tzelepes Protobestiarios1,2 b. 1114, d. 1145 |
Mother | unknown (?) of Rum1,3 |
Last Edited | 20 Feb 2020 |
Shah Suleiman (?) died in 1042.1
; Rudt-Collenberg: "founder of the Konya branch ... Mohammed the Conqueror pretends in 1453 descent from this branch."1
; Rudt-Collenberg: "founder of the Konya branch ... Mohammed the Conqueror pretends in 1453 descent from this branch."1
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XII (Com.): The House of Comnenos. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S2203] Foundation for Medieval Genealogy (FMG): MEDIEVAL LANDS - A prosopography of medieval European noble and royal families, online http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/index.htm, https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/BYZANTIUM%2010571204.htm#IoannesKTzelepesdied1145. Hereinafter cited as FMG Medieval Lands Website.
- [S2203] FMG Medieval Lands Website, online http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/index.htm, https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/TURKS.htm#dauMasudIMIoannesKomnenos
Barisanus (?) Connetable de Jaffa1
M, #66220, d. before 1145
Last Edited | 12 Jun 2020 |
Barisanus (?) Connetable de Jaffa married Helvis (?) before 1122.1,2
Barisanus (?) Connetable de Jaffa died before 1145.1
Barisanus (?) Connetable de Jaffa was also known as Balian I (?) Connetable de Jaffa.2
; Per Med Lands:
"BALIAN [I] ([1070/80]-[Feb 1141/27 Sep 1145). The origin of Balian is not known. According to the Lignages d'Outremer, "Balian le Fransois fu frere au comte Guillaumin de Chartres" but this seems unlikely, the same source conflating Balian [I] with Balian [II][780]. Baudouin I King of Jerusalem confirmed donations to the church of St Marie, Josaphat by charter dated to [1115], including a donation by "…Barianus constabularius Joppæ…"[781]. William of Tyre records "Barisanus Joppe constabularius" among those present at the Council of Nablus in 1120 at which Gormundus Patriarch of Jerusalem delivered a sermon[782]. "Balyanus Joppensis constabularius" donated property to the church of St Jean, Nablus, for the salvation of "uxoris Heluissæ", by charter dated May 1122, confirmed by "Hugone Rametensi, Balduino fratre eius domino Mirabelli, necnon Baliano"[783]. "Barisanus constabularius Joppensis" donated "casale Algie in territorio Ascalonis" to the Hospitallers, with the consent of "Hugonis domini Joppensis, et Emmæ uxoris", by charter dated 17 Jan 1126[784]. William of Tyre records him as "Balianus senior" in 1132[785], suggesting that he was the father of another Balian. Balian was mentioned as a deceased benefactor, along with Guillaume of Bures (who was alive in Feb 1141), in the document confirming the constitution of the hospital of Notre Dame de Josephat, which was sealed by Guillaume Patriarch of Jerusalem, who died 27 Sep 1145, and so although undated must have been issued before that date[786].
"m HELVIS, daughter of ---. "Balyanus Joppensis constabularius" donated property to the church of St Jean, Nablus, for the salvation of "uxoris Heluissæ", by charter dated May 1122, confirmed by "Hugone Rametensi, Balduino fratre eius domino Mirabelli, necnon Baliano"[787]. "
Med Lands cites:
Barisanus (?) Connetable de Jaffa died before 1145.1
Barisanus (?) Connetable de Jaffa was also known as Balian I (?) Connetable de Jaffa.2
; Per Med Lands:
"BALIAN [I] ([1070/80]-[Feb 1141/27 Sep 1145). The origin of Balian is not known. According to the Lignages d'Outremer, "Balian le Fransois fu frere au comte Guillaumin de Chartres" but this seems unlikely, the same source conflating Balian [I] with Balian [II][780]. Baudouin I King of Jerusalem confirmed donations to the church of St Marie, Josaphat by charter dated to [1115], including a donation by "…Barianus constabularius Joppæ…"[781]. William of Tyre records "Barisanus Joppe constabularius" among those present at the Council of Nablus in 1120 at which Gormundus Patriarch of Jerusalem delivered a sermon[782]. "Balyanus Joppensis constabularius" donated property to the church of St Jean, Nablus, for the salvation of "uxoris Heluissæ", by charter dated May 1122, confirmed by "Hugone Rametensi, Balduino fratre eius domino Mirabelli, necnon Baliano"[783]. "Barisanus constabularius Joppensis" donated "casale Algie in territorio Ascalonis" to the Hospitallers, with the consent of "Hugonis domini Joppensis, et Emmæ uxoris", by charter dated 17 Jan 1126[784]. William of Tyre records him as "Balianus senior" in 1132[785], suggesting that he was the father of another Balian. Balian was mentioned as a deceased benefactor, along with Guillaume of Bures (who was alive in Feb 1141), in the document confirming the constitution of the hospital of Notre Dame de Josephat, which was sealed by Guillaume Patriarch of Jerusalem, who died 27 Sep 1145, and so although undated must have been issued before that date[786].
"m HELVIS, daughter of ---. "Balyanus Joppensis constabularius" donated property to the church of St Jean, Nablus, for the salvation of "uxoris Heluissæ", by charter dated May 1122, confirmed by "Hugone Rametensi, Balduino fratre eius domino Mirabelli, necnon Baliano"[787]. "
Med Lands cites:
[780] Lignages d'Outremer, Le Vaticanus Latinus 4789, CCC.XXXVII, p. 97.
[781] Röhricht (1893), 80, p. 18.
[782] WT XII.XIII, pp. 531-2.
[783] Röhricht (1893), 100, p. 22.
[784] Röhricht (1893), 112, p. 27.
[785] WT XIV.XVI, p. 630.
[786] Rüdt-Collenberg (1965), pp. 452-3.
[787] Röhricht (1893), 100, p. 22.2
He was Connetable of Jaffa between 1115 and 1130.1[781] Röhricht (1893), 80, p. 18.
[782] WT XII.XIII, pp. 531-2.
[783] Röhricht (1893), 100, p. 22.
[784] Röhricht (1893), 112, p. 27.
[785] WT XIV.XVI, p. 630.
[786] Rüdt-Collenberg (1965), pp. 452-3.
[787] Röhricht (1893), 100, p. 22.2
Family | Helvis (?) |
Child |
|
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S2203] Foundation for Medieval Genealogy (FMG): MEDIEVAL LANDS - A prosopography of medieval European noble and royal families, online http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/index.htm, https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/JERUSALEM%20NOBILITY.htm#BalianIbelinNablusdied1193A. Hereinafter cited as FMG Medieval Lands Website.
- [S2203] FMG Medieval Lands Website, online http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/index.htm, https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/JERUSALEM%20NOBILITY.htm#BalianIbelinRamadied1150
Etienette d'Ibelin1
F, #66221, d. 1187
Father | Baudouin I d'Ibelin Lord of Mirabel and Rama1,2 b. 1133, d. bt 1186 - 1188 |
Mother | Richilde/Richent de Beth'san1,2 |
Last Edited | 8 Oct 2020 |
Etienette d'Ibelin married Amaury (?) Vicecomes de Nauplia before November 1175.1
Etienette d'Ibelin died in 1187.1
Etienette d'Ibelin died in 1187.1
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S2203] Foundation for Medieval Genealogy (FMG): MEDIEVAL LANDS - A prosopography of medieval European noble and royal families, online http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/index.htm, https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/JERUSALEM%20NOBILITY.htm#BaudouinIbelinMirabeldied1186. Hereinafter cited as FMG Medieval Lands Website.
Amaury (?) Vicecomes de Nauplia1
M, #66222
Last Edited | 28 Sep 2004 |
Amaury (?) Vicecomes de Nauplia married Etienette d'Ibelin, daughter of Baudouin I d'Ibelin Lord of Mirabel and Rama and Richilde/Richent de Beth'san, before November 1175.1
Family | Etienette d'Ibelin d. 1187 |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
Jean (?) d'Arsur1
M, #66223
Last Edited | 28 Sep 2004 |
Family | |
Child |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
Euphemia (?) of Pertag1,2
F, #66224
Father | Michael (?) Lord of Pertag3,2 d. 1200 |
Last Edited | 28 Sep 2004 |
Family | Vahran (?) Lord of Korikos, Marshal of Armenia d. 1222 |
Child |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc., p. 54.
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc., Chart IV (SP): The Saven-Pahlavouni and Mamikonean.
Michael (?) Lord of Pertag1
M, #66225, d. 1200
Father | Schahan "Zoravark" (?) Sebastos Stratège2 d. a 1173 |
Last Edited | 28 Sep 2004 |
Michael (?) Lord of Pertag died in 1200.1
Family | |
Child |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart IV (SP): The Saven-Pahlavouni and Mamikonean. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc., Chart IV (SP): The Savèn-Pahllavouni and Mamikonean.
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc., p. 54.
Hethum/Vasil (?) of Sassoun, Lord of Missis1
M, #66226, d. 1193
Last Edited | 15 Jul 2009 |
Hethum/Vasil (?) of Sassoun, Lord of Missis married Alix (Isabeau) (?) of Armenia, dame de Toron, daughter of Rupen III (?) of Armenia, Lord of the Mountains and Isabelle (?) de Thoron, in 1189
; his 2nd wife; her 1st husband; Rudt-Collenberg says marriage was never consummated.1,2,3
Hethum/Vasil (?) of Sassoun, Lord of Missis died in 1193; assassinated.1
; his 2nd wife; her 1st husband; Rudt-Collenberg says marriage was never consummated.1,2,3
Hethum/Vasil (?) of Sassoun, Lord of Missis died in 1193; assassinated.1
Family | Alix (Isabeau) (?) of Armenia, dame de Toron b. bt 1182 - 1183, d. a 1234 |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart IV (SP): The Saven-Pahlavouni and Mamikonean. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc., p. 54.
- [S2280] Racines et Histoire, online http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/LGN-frameset.html, http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/PDF/Antioche.pdf, p. 6. Hereinafter cited as Racines et Histoire.
Anais/Marguerite de Reynel1,2,3
F, #66227, d. 1252
Father | Arnoul de Reynel sn de Pierrefitte et de Cirey1,2,4,5 d. c 1228 |
Mother | Ida de Brienne1,2,4,6 |
Last Edited | 18 Aug 2020 |
Anais/Marguerite de Reynel married Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem, son of Reynold/Renaud (?) Lord of Sidon and Beaufort and Helvis d'Ibelin, in 1228
;
His 1st wife.1,2,7,3
Anais/Marguerite de Reynel died in 1252; Rudt-Collenberg Chart XI says d. 1251; Chart IX says d. 1254.1,2
Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag, Marburg, Schwennicke, Detlev (Ed.) 3/4: 682.3 Anais/Marguerite de Reynel was also known as Marguerite de Risnel.1 She and Friedrich II/IV Roger (?) Holy Roman Emperor, King of Jerusalem were associated; Misstress.3,8
;
His 1st wife.1,2,7,3
Anais/Marguerite de Reynel died in 1252; Rudt-Collenberg Chart XI says d. 1251; Chart IX says d. 1254.1,2
Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag, Marburg, Schwennicke, Detlev (Ed.) 3/4: 682.3 Anais/Marguerite de Reynel was also known as Marguerite de Risnel.1 She and Friedrich II/IV Roger (?) Holy Roman Emperor, King of Jerusalem were associated; Misstress.3,8
Family | Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem b. c 1196, d. 1240 |
Children |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc., Chart IX (B): The House of Brienne-Jerusalem.
- [S1490] Genealogics Website (oiginated by Leo van de Pas, continued by Ian Fettes), online http://www.genealogics.org/index.php, Anais|Marguerite de Brienne: https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00330117&tree=LEO. Hereinafter cited as Genealogics Website.
- [S2203] Foundation for Medieval Genealogy (FMG): MEDIEVAL LANDS - A prosopography of medieval European noble and royal families, online http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/index.htm, https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/chambasbol.htm#ArnoulReyneldied1228. Hereinafter cited as FMG Medieval Lands Website.
- [S1490] Genealogics Website, online http://www.genealogics.org/index.php, Arnoul de Reynel: https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00139849&tree=LEO
- [S1490] Genealogics Website, online http://www.genealogics.org/index.php, Ida de Brienne: https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00139850&tree=LEO
- [S1490] Genealogics Website, online http://www.genealogics.org/index.php, Balian I: https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00139847&tree=LEO
- [S1490] Genealogics Website, online http://www.genealogics.org/index.php, Friedrich II: https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00013463&tree=LEO
Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem1,2
M, #66228, b. circa 1196, d. 1240
Father | Reynold/Renaud (?) Lord of Sidon and Beaufort1,2 d. bt 1200 - 1204 |
Mother | Helvis d'Ibelin1,2 d. 1 Jun 1216 |
Last Edited | 3 Aug 2020 |
Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem was born circa 1196.2 He married Ida (Oda) de Reynel, daughter of Arnoul de Reynel sn de Pierrefitte et de Cirey and Ida de Brienne, in 1218
;
His 2nd wife.3,2 Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem married Anais/Marguerite de Reynel, daughter of Arnoul de Reynel sn de Pierrefitte et de Cirey and Ida de Brienne, in 1228
;
His 1st wife.1,4,2,5
Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem died in 1240.1,2
;
His 2nd wife.3,2 Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem married Anais/Marguerite de Reynel, daughter of Arnoul de Reynel sn de Pierrefitte et de Cirey and Ida de Brienne, in 1228
;
His 1st wife.1,4,2,5
Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem died in 1240.1,2
Family 1 | Ida (Oda) de Reynel d. 5 Jun 1254 |
Child |
|
Family 2 | Anais/Marguerite de Reynel d. 1252 |
Children |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S1490] Genealogics Website (oiginated by Leo van de Pas, continued by Ian Fettes), online http://www.genealogics.org/index.php, Balian I: https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00139847&tree=LEO. Hereinafter cited as Genealogics Website.
- [S1490] Genealogics Website, online http://www.genealogics.org/index.php, Ida (Oda) de Reynel: https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00139848&tree=LEO
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc., Chart IX (B): The House of Brienne-Jerusalem.
- [S1490] Genealogics Website, online http://www.genealogics.org/index.php, Anais|Marguerite de Brienne: https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00330117&tree=LEO
Agnes Garnier de Sidon-Sagette1,2
F, #66229
Father | Reynold/Renaud (?) Lord of Sidon and Beaufort d. bt 1200 - 1204; Racines et Histoire says her father was Balian Garnier, seigneur de Sidon et de Beaufort and her mother was Marguerite de Raynel1,2 |
Mother | Helvis d'Ibelin1 d. 1 Jun 1216 |
Last Edited | 20 Sep 2020 |
Agnes Garnier de Sidon-Sagette married Raoul de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade, son of Gauthier/Wautier de Saint-Omer and Eschiva II de Bures Princess of Galilee, Lady of Tiberias,
;
Her 1st husband.1,3 Agnes Garnier de Sidon-Sagette married Guillaume de Boutron of Antiochia, Lord of Boutron, son of Bohemund (?) d’Antioche, seigneur de Boutron and Plivane (?) Heiress of Boutron,
; her 2nd husband.1,4,2
; Per Racines et Histoire (Saint-Omer): “Raoul de Saint-Omer ° avant 1174 + après 1220 Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade (1204)
ép. Agnès Grenier (fille de Renaud, seigneur de Sidon)”.3
;
Her 1st husband.1,3 Agnes Garnier de Sidon-Sagette married Guillaume de Boutron of Antiochia, Lord of Boutron, son of Bohemund (?) d’Antioche, seigneur de Boutron and Plivane (?) Heiress of Boutron,
; her 2nd husband.1,4,2
; Per Racines et Histoire (Saint-Omer): “Raoul de Saint-Omer ° avant 1174 + après 1220 Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade (1204)
ép. Agnès Grenier (fille de Renaud, seigneur de Sidon)”.3
Family 1 | Raoul de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade b. b 1174, d. a 1220 |
Family 2 | Guillaume de Boutron of Antiochia, Lord of Boutron d. a 1262 |
Child |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S2280] Racines et Histoire, online http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/LGN-frameset.html, http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/PDF/Antioche.pdf, p. 9. Hereinafter cited as Racines et Histoire.
- [S2280] Racines et Histoire, online http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/LGN-frameset.html, Châtelains de Saint-Omer & Morbecque, Fauquembergues , p. 13: http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/PDF/Saint-Omer.pdf
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc., Chart VI (A): The House of the Princes of Antiochia.
Raoul de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade1,2
M, #66230, b. before 1174, d. after 1220
Father | Gauthier/Wautier de Saint-Omer2 b. c 1130, d. b 1174 |
Mother | Eschiva II de Bures Princess of Galilee, Lady of Tiberias2 |
Last Edited | 20 Sep 2020 |
Raoul de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade married Agnes Garnier de Sidon-Sagette, daughter of Reynold/Renaud (?) Lord of Sidon and Beaufort and Helvis d'Ibelin,
;
Her 1st husband.1,2 Raoul de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade was born before 1174.2
Raoul de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade died after 1220.2
; Per Racines et Histoire (Saint-Omer): “Raoul de Saint-Omer ° avant 1174 + après 1220 Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade (1204)
ép. Agnès Grenier (fille de Renaud, seigneur de Sidon)”.2
;
Her 1st husband.1,2 Raoul de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade was born before 1174.2
Raoul de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade died after 1220.2
; Per Racines et Histoire (Saint-Omer): “Raoul de Saint-Omer ° avant 1174 + après 1220 Sénéchal de Jérusalem, Prince de Galilée et Tibériade (1204)
ép. Agnès Grenier (fille de Renaud, seigneur de Sidon)”.2
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S2280] Racines et Histoire, online http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/LGN-frameset.html, Châtelains de Saint-Omer & Morbecque, Fauquembergues , p. 13: http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/PDF/Saint-Omer.pdf. Hereinafter cited as Racines et Histoire.
Guillaume de Boutron of Antiochia, Lord of Boutron1,2,3
M, #66231, d. after 1262
Father | Bohemund (?) d’Antioche, seigneur de Boutron2,3 b. 1200, d. a 18 Oct 1244 |
Mother | Plivane (?) Heiress of Boutron2,3 d. c 1233 |
Last Edited | 31 Jul 2009 |
Guillaume de Boutron of Antiochia, Lord of Boutron married Agnes Garnier de Sidon-Sagette, daughter of Reynold/Renaud (?) Lord of Sidon and Beaufort and Helvis d'Ibelin,
; her 2nd husband.1,2,3
Guillaume de Boutron of Antiochia, Lord of Boutron died after 1262.1,3
He was Connétable de Jérusalem in 1262 at Jerusalem, Israel (now).3 He was living in 1262.3
; her 2nd husband.1,2,3
Guillaume de Boutron of Antiochia, Lord of Boutron died after 1262.1,3
He was Connétable de Jérusalem in 1262 at Jerusalem, Israel (now).3 He was living in 1262.3
Family | Agnes Garnier de Sidon-Sagette |
Child |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc., Chart VI (A): The House of the Princes of Antiochia.
- [S2280] Racines et Histoire, online http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/LGN-frameset.html, http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/PDF/Antioche.pdf, p. 9. Hereinafter cited as Racines et Histoire.
Euphemie (?) de Sidon1
F, #66232
Father | Reynold/Renaud (?) Lord of Sidon and Beaufort1 d. bt 1200 - 1204 |
Mother | Helvis d'Ibelin1 d. 1 Jun 1216 |
Last Edited | 29 Sep 2004 |
Family | Hoste de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Lord of Djidjer (Armenia) d. a 1218 |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
Hoste de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Lord of Djidjer (Armenia)1
M, #66233, d. after 1218
Last Edited | 20 Sep 2020 |
Hoste de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Lord of Djidjer (Armenia) married Euphemie (?) de Sidon, daughter of Reynold/Renaud (?) Lord of Sidon and Beaufort and Helvis d'Ibelin.1
Hoste de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Lord of Djidjer (Armenia) died after 1218.1
He was Lord of Djidjer between 1199 and 1214 at Djidjer, Armenia, Cilicia (Turkey now).1
Hoste de Saint-Omer-Tiberias Lord of Djidjer (Armenia) died after 1218.1
He was Lord of Djidjer between 1199 and 1214 at Djidjer, Armenia, Cilicia (Turkey now).1
Family | Euphemie (?) de Sidon |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
Philippe (?) de Sidon, Lord of Beaufort1
M, #66234
Father | Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem1 b. c 1196, d. 1240 |
Mother | Anais/Marguerite de Reynel1 d. 1252 |
Last Edited | 29 Sep 2004 |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
Giles (?) de Sidon1
M, #66235
Father | Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem1 b. c 1196, d. 1240 |
Mother | Anais/Marguerite de Reynel1 d. 1252 |
Last Edited | 29 Sep 2004 |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
Isabelle (?) de Sidon1
F, #66236
Father | Balian I (?) Lord of Sidon, Regent/Bailli of Jerusalem1 b. c 1196, d. 1240 |
Mother | Anais/Marguerite de Reynel1 d. 1252 |
Last Edited | 29 Sep 2004 |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
(?) d'Ibelin1
F, #66237
Father | Jean I "the Old" d'Ibelin Lord of Beirut and Arsur, Constable and Bailiff of Jerusalem, Bailiff of Cyprus1 b. c 1178, d. c Feb 1236 |
Mother | Melisende (?) d'Arsur; Lady of Arsur1 |
Last Edited | 29 Sep 2004 |
Family | Armesius de Gibelet |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.
Balian "le Malgarni" d'Ibelin1
M, #66239
Father | Baudouin d'Ibelin Senechal of Cyprus1 b. b 1128, d. bt 21 Feb 1266 - 1267 |
Mother | Alix de Beth'san1 |
Last Edited | 29 Sep 2004 |
Balian "le Malgarni" d'Ibelin married Marguerite (?) de Tripolis, daughter of Raymond (?) Vicecomes de Tripolis,
; his 1st wife.1 Balian "le Malgarni" d'Ibelin married Marie de Cafran, daughter of Henri de Cafran.1
; his 1st wife.1 Balian "le Malgarni" d'Ibelin married Marie de Cafran, daughter of Henri de Cafran.1
Family 1 | Marie de Cafran |
Family 2 | Marguerite (?) de Tripolis |
Citations
- [S1671] Count W. H. Rüdt-Collenberg, The Rupenides, Hethumides and Lusignans: The Structure of the Armeno-Cilician Dynasties (11, Rude de Lille, Paris 7e, France: Librairie C. Klincksieck for the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Armenian Library (Lisbon), 1963), Chart XI (I.): The House of Ibelin. Hereinafter cited as Rudt-Collenberg: The Rupenides, etc.