Person Page - 2155

     Henri III (?) Count of Luxemburg died after 12 April 1095.¹
      ; Count of Luxemburg.¹

     Konrad (?) was living in 1080.¹

      ; Abbot of St. Vannes.¹

     Konrad II (?) Count of Luxemburg married Ermgard von Zutphen Heiress of Zutphen, daughter of Otto II "the Rich" (?) Graaf van Zutphen and Judith (?) of Arnstein, before 1134
;
Her 2nd husband.^1,2,7,8
Konrad II (?) Count of Luxemburg died in 1136.⁹
     Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: VI 128.⁹

; Per Med Lands:
     "CONRAD de Luxembourg (-1136). The Chronicle of Alberic de Trois-Fontaines names "Conrardi" as son of "comitem Guilelmum de Luscelenburg" & his wife[212]. “Wilhelmus comes de Lucemburgh...et filius meus Conradus” confirmed donations, made in 1183 by “patrem meum Conradum comitem...annuente matre mea Clementia et fratribus meis” to the abbey of Luxembourg by charter dated to [1123][213]. He succeeded his father in [1129/31] as CONRAD II Comte de Luxembourg.
     "m (before 1134) as her second husband, ERMGARD van Zutphen, widow of GERHARD [II] Graaf van Gelre, daughter of OTTO [II] "der Reiche" Graaf van Zutphen & his wife Judith ---. A charter dated 1134 records the donation by "Domina Ermengardis comitissa…hæres legitima oppidi Sutphaniensis…cum marito suo Cunrado comite de Lucelenburg et filio suo Henrico" of "ecclesiam Lochemensem", confirmed by the bishop of Utrecht, for the souls of "mariti sui Gerardi…domini Ottonis comitis patris sui et matris suæ Judithæ et fratrum suorum piæ memoriæ…episcopi Theodrici et comitum Henrici et Gerardi"[214]."
Med Lands cites:

; Per genealogics: "Ct Conrad II of Luxemburg (1129-36), +1136; m. Irmgard, dau.and heiress of Gf Otto von Zütphen."²

; Count of Luxemburg.¹

      ; Graf von Gleiberg.¹

     Wilhelm (?) Graf von Gleiberg married Salome von Isenburg.^3,4,5,1

Wilhelm (?) Graf von Gleiberg died after 1158.³
     Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag, Marburg, Schwennicke, Detlev (Ed.) 12:47.⁴ EDV-26.

; Per Genealogy.EU: "E2. Wilhelm, Gf von Gleiberg 1131/58; m.Salome von Isenburg."¹

; Per Med Lands: "WILHELM (-after 1158). Graf von Gleiberg. Wilhelm is shown in Europäische Stammtafeln as the son of Conrad II Comte de Luxembourg, and therefore the grandson of Conrad I Comte de Luxembourg and his [second] wife Clementia von Gleiberg[104]. That hypothesis is presumably based on the following two documents: firstly, "Clementia comitissa de Glizberg cum meis nepotibus Ottone et Wilhelmo" confirmed the foundation of Schiffenberg, with the consent of "domne Gertrudis palatine…[et] Adela filia eiusdem palatine", by charter dated 1141[105]; secondly, "Wilhelmus et Otto comites de Glizperch, consanguinei" confirmed the foundation of Schiffenberg, by "domna Clementia quondam in Glizpurch comitissa, consanguinea nostra", by charter dated 1141[106]. These two documents show that Otto and Wilhelm Grafen von Gleiberg were not brothers but related more distantly ("consanguinei"), maybe first or second cousins. The documents also show that they were related to Clementia, widow of Conrad I Comte de Luxembourg ("consanguinea nostra"). The reconstruction shown in Europäische Stammtafeln assumes that "nepotibus" in the first document should be interpreted as "grandchildren". However, it is not at all clear that this interpretation can be correct. If it was, why would they describe Clementia in the second document using the imprecise term "consanguinea" when she would have been, respectively, their great-grandmother and grandmother? An alternative possibility is therefore that Otto and Wilhelm were not members of the Luxembourg family at all but were related to Clementia through her own family (or the family of another of her husbands, see below), assuming that "nepotibus" should be interpreted as "nephews". This alternative would also explain why the county of Luxembourg was not inherited by any member of this "Gleiberg" family on the death of Comte Conrad II, but passed to Conrad´s paternal aunt Ermensende. "Wilhelmus comes de Glizberg…et uxor mea Salome" donated "Westerwalt" to the church of "Aldinburg…iuxta Arnsburg" by charter dated [1150/59][107]. The Annales Sancti Disibodi (Continuatio) name "…Wilhelmus comes de Glizberg…" among those present with the king when he celebrated Christmas at Worms in 1155[108]. “Wilhelmus comes palatinus de Tubingen” confirmed an agreement between Kloster Shiffenberg and “nobilibus viris de Gliberg Wilhelmo et Ottone nostris consanguineis” concerning the church in Steinbach by charter dated 1229[109].] m SALOME, daughter of --- (-after 1206). "Wilhelmus comes de Glizberg…et uxor mea Salome" donated "Westerwalt" to the church of "Aldinburg…iuxta Arnsburg" by charter dated [1150/59][110]. An indication of her family origin is provided by the charter dated 1206 under which "Domini de Metricha…Henricus comes de Nassowe et nepos suus Walramus, Anselmus de Moluisberg, Solomena…matrona cum filia sui Metildi et genero suo Rodulpho Palatino comite de Tuingen, Hermannus etiam miles eiusdem loci indigena" donated "terram…super ripam Mosellæ in loco…Rore" to Himmenrode monastery, with the consent of "hæredes eorum…prefatus Rodulphus Palatinus comes de Tuingen et filii sui Hugo, Rodolphus et Wilhelmus, Henricus junior comes de Sayne, Robertus et Henricus filii prædicti Walrami comitis de Nassowe, Everhardus bourchgravius de Arberg et uxor sua Adeleidis de Moluisberg"[111]. The precise family relationship between all the parties named in this document has not yet been traced."
Med Lands cites: He was Graf von Gleiberg between 1131 and 1158.¹

     Salome von Isenburg married Wilhelm (?) Graf von Gleiberg, son of Guillaume I de Luxembourg Comte de Luxembourg and Liutgard/Mathilde (?) von Beichlingen.^2,3,4,1

      ; Per Med Lands: "WILHELM (-after 1158). Graf von Gleiberg. Wilhelm is shown in Europäische Stammtafeln as the son of Conrad II Comte de Luxembourg, and therefore the grandson of Conrad I Comte de Luxembourg and his [second] wife Clementia von Gleiberg[104]. That hypothesis is presumably based on the following two documents: firstly, "Clementia comitissa de Glizberg cum meis nepotibus Ottone et Wilhelmo" confirmed the foundation of Schiffenberg, with the consent of "domne Gertrudis palatine…[et] Adela filia eiusdem palatine", by charter dated 1141[105]; secondly, "Wilhelmus et Otto comites de Glizperch, consanguinei" confirmed the foundation of Schiffenberg, by "domna Clementia quondam in Glizpurch comitissa, consanguinea nostra", by charter dated 1141[106]. These two documents show that Otto and Wilhelm Grafen von Gleiberg were not brothers but related more distantly ("consanguinei"), maybe first or second cousins. The documents also show that they were related to Clementia, widow of Conrad I Comte de Luxembourg ("consanguinea nostra"). The reconstruction shown in Europäische Stammtafeln assumes that "nepotibus" in the first document should be interpreted as "grandchildren". However, it is not at all clear that this interpretation can be correct. If it was, why would they describe Clementia in the second document using the imprecise term "consanguinea" when she would have been, respectively, their great-grandmother and grandmother? An alternative possibility is therefore that Otto and Wilhelm were not members of the Luxembourg family at all but were related to Clementia through her own family (or the family of another of her husbands, see below), assuming that "nepotibus" should be interpreted as "nephews". This alternative would also explain why the county of Luxembourg was not inherited by any member of this "Gleiberg" family on the death of Comte Conrad II, but passed to Conrad´s paternal aunt Ermensende. "Wilhelmus comes de Glizberg…et uxor mea Salome" donated "Westerwalt" to the church of "Aldinburg…iuxta Arnsburg" by charter dated [1150/59][107]. The Annales Sancti Disibodi (Continuatio) name "…Wilhelmus comes de Glizberg…" among those present with the king when he celebrated Christmas at Worms in 1155[108]. “Wilhelmus comes palatinus de Tubingen” confirmed an agreement between Kloster Shiffenberg and “nobilibus viris de Gliberg Wilhelmo et Ottone nostris consanguineis” concerning the church in Steinbach by charter dated 1229[109].] m SALOME, daughter of --- (-after 1206). "Wilhelmus comes de Glizberg…et uxor mea Salome" donated "Westerwalt" to the church of "Aldinburg…iuxta Arnsburg" by charter dated [1150/59][110]. An indication of her family origin is provided by the charter dated 1206 under which "Domini de Metricha…Henricus comes de Nassowe et nepos suus Walramus, Anselmus de Moluisberg, Solomena…matrona cum filia sui Metildi et genero suo Rodulpho Palatino comite de Tuingen, Hermannus etiam miles eiusdem loci indigena" donated "terram…super ripam Mosellæ in loco…Rore" to Himmenrode monastery, with the consent of "hæredes eorum…prefatus Rodulphus Palatinus comes de Tuingen et filii sui Hugo, Rodolphus et Wilhelmus, Henricus junior comes de Sayne, Robertus et Henricus filii prædicti Walrami comitis de Nassowe, Everhardus bourchgravius de Arberg et uxor sua Adeleidis de Moluisberg"[111]. The precise family relationship between all the parties named in this document has not yet been traced."
Med Lands cites: EDV-26.

; Per Med Lands: "m SALOME, daughter of --- (-after 1206). "Wilhelmus comes de Glizberg…et uxor mea Salome" donated "Westerwalt" to the church of "Aldinburg…iuxta Arnsburg" by charter dated [1150/59][110]. An indication of her family origin is provided by the charter dated 1206 under which "Domini de Metricha…Henricus comes de Nassowe et nepos suus Walramus, Anselmus de Moluisberg, Solomena…matrona cum filia sui Metildi et genero suo Rodulpho Palatino comite de Tuingen, Hermannus etiam miles eiusdem loci indigena" donated "terram…super ripam Mosellæ in loco…Rore" to Himmenrode monastery, with the consent of "hæredes eorum…prefatus Rodulphus Palatinus comes de Tuingen et filii sui Hugo, Rodolphus et Wilhelmus, Henricus junior comes de Sayne, Robertus et Henricus filii prædicti Walrami comitis de Nassowe, Everhardus bourchgravius de Arberg et uxor sua Adeleidis de Moluisberg"[111]. The precise family relationship between all the parties named in this document has not yet been traced."
Med Lands cites: [110] Gudenus, Tome I, LXXV, p. 203.²

Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag, Marburg, Schwennicke, Detlev (Ed.) 12:47.⁴

     NN (?) de Luxembourg married Udo (?) Graf von Limburg.^1,2

      ; Per Med Lands.
     "[daughter ([1030/45]-after 1065). The existence of this person is speculative: she is not named in any suriviving primary sources. As explained in the document LIMBURG, there are two alternative cases which explain the ancestry of Hendrik [I] Graaf van Limburg. In each case, a possible marriage of Udo Graaf van Limburg helps explain the hypotheses. In Alternative (1), Hendrik would have been the son of Waléran [II] Comte d’Arlon. Consistent with this alternative, an explanation is needed for Hendrik’s predecessor in Limburg, Udo, having succeeded Frédéric de Luxembourg Duke of Lower Lotharingia both in Limburg and in the advocacy of Saint-Trond. A marriage between Udo and an otherwise unrecorded older daughter of Duke Frédéric provides one possible explanation. If this case, Udo would have married before he was named at Limburg in 1061, and presumably his supposed wife would have been alive in 1065 when Udo succeeded as avocat of Saint-Trond. For hyperlinking purposes only, this case would be: m ([before 1061]) Udo Graaf van Limburg, son of --- (-[1065/75]⁴ or 1078).]"

; Per Med Lands:
     "UDO, son of --- (-[1065/75] or 1078). Graaf van Limburg: "Comes Udo de Lemborch" donated a serf to the church of St Adalbert, Aachen by charter dated 1061[16]. Avocat of Saint-Trond: the Gesta Abbatem Trudonensium records in 1065 that, after “duce Frederico” [Frédéric Duke of Lower Lotharingia] was dead, confirmations were made regarding payments at the request of “domno Udone successore eius” and in the presence of “domni Adalberonis” [Adalbero Bishop of Metz, brother of the deceased Frédéric Duke of Lower Lotharingia][17]. A charter dated 1065 records the same confirmation: “Adalbero Metensis Episcopus”, noting the dispute between “germanum meum ducem Lotharingiæ Fredericum” and Saint-Trond regarding payments to the avocat, confirmed the situation in the presence of "domino Udone fratris mei successore [who had received “eamdem advocatiam in beneficio a nobis”]...et Ottone subadvocato"[18]. Udo presumably died before [1072/75], the estimated date of a charter, under which “Osmuth et Warburg” committed themselves to Saint-Trond, whose dating clause records “...Ottone advocato” [Otto de Looz Comte de Duras (see LOWER LOTHARINGIA NOBILITY, who was restored as full avocat of Saint-Trond after Udo died][19]. Kupper suggests that the following entry refers to Udo Graaf van Limburg[20]: the necrology of Prüm records the death in 1078 of “Udo comes”[21]. This date appears incompatible with Udo’s earlier loss of the advocacy, unless this was due to long-term incapacity before death or, assuming that Alternative (1) of Udo’s possible marriages shown below is correct, the death of his wife which would presumably have removed Udo’s legitimacy as Duke Frédéric’s successor.
     "The question of Udo’s possible marriage is speculative: it is not indicated directly in any surviving primary source. As explained in detail further below, two possible alternative cases may explain the ancestry of Udo’s successor, Hendrik [I] Graaf van Limburg. In each case, a possible marriage of Udo forms part of the overall picture and may help explain the hypotheses.
     "Under Alternative (1), Hendrik [I] would have been the son of Waléran [II] Comte d’Arlon. Consistent with this alternative, an explanation is needed for Hendrik’s predecessor in Limburg, Udo, succeeding Frédéric de Luxembourg Duke of Lower Lotharingia both in Limburg and in the advocacy of Saint-Trond. A marriage between Udo and an otherwise unrecorded older daughter of Duke Frédéric provides one possible explanation. If that is correct, Udo would have married before he was named at Limburg in 1061, and presumably his supposed wife would still have been alive in 1065 when Udo succeeded as avocat of Saint-Trond. For hyperlinking purposes only, this case would be: m ([before 1061]) --- de Luxembourg, daughter of Frédéric Duke of Lower Lotharingia [Luxembourg] & his first wife Gerberge de Boulogne ([1030/45]-after 1065).
     "Under Alternative (2), Hendrik would have been the son of Jutta [Judith], known daughter of Frédéric de Luxembourg Duke of Lower Lotharingia, by an unknown husband. Kupper suggests that Udo Graaf van Limburg was the unknown husband[22]. For hyperlinking purposes only, this case would be: m Jutta [Judith] de Luxembourg, daughter of Frédéric Duke of Lower Lotharingia [Luxembourg] & his first wife Gerberge de Boulogne. Kupper’s hypothesis is not entirely satisfactory. While this possible identification is an obvious one as Udo was Hendrik’s immediate predecessor in Limburg, Hendrik inherited Limburg from his mother whoever his father was. In addition, the absence of the name Udo among Hendrik’s known descendants also appears to suggest some doubt about his possible identification as Jutta’s husband. A further point is that, after Udo died, Hendrik did not inherit the advocacy of Saint-Trond, which passed to Otto de Looz Comte de Duras. The advocacy in fact passed from Otto’s son Giselbert to Hendrik’s son Walram in [1124/27], which suggests the resolution of a long-standing dispute which may be understandable if Hendrik’s right was not inherited from Udo in a direct line."
Med Lands cites:

     Udo (?) Graf von Limburg married NN (?) de Luxembourg, daughter of Friedrich II (?) Graf von Luxemburg, Duke of Lower Lorraine and Gerberge (?) de Boulogne.^1,2

Udo (?) Graf von Limburg died between 1065 and 1078.²
      ; Per Med Lands:
     "UDO, son of --- (-[1065/75] or 1078). Graaf van Limburg: "Comes Udo de Lemborch" donated a serf to the church of St Adalbert, Aachen by charter dated 1061[16]. Avocat of Saint-Trond: the Gesta Abbatem Trudonensium records in 1065 that, after “duce Frederico” [Frédéric Duke of Lower Lotharingia] was dead, confirmations were made regarding payments at the request of “domno Udone successore eius” and in the presence of “domni Adalberonis” [Adalbero Bishop of Metz, brother of the deceased Frédéric Duke of Lower Lotharingia][17]. A charter dated 1065 records the same confirmation: “Adalbero Metensis Episcopus”, noting the dispute between “germanum meum ducem Lotharingiæ Fredericum” and Saint-Trond regarding payments to the avocat, confirmed the situation in the presence of "domino Udone fratris mei successore [who had received “eamdem advocatiam in beneficio a nobis”]...et Ottone subadvocato"[18]. Udo presumably died before [1072/75], the estimated date of a charter, under which “Osmuth et Warburg” committed themselves to Saint-Trond, whose dating clause records “...Ottone advocato” [Otto de Looz Comte de Duras (see LOWER LOTHARINGIA NOBILITY, who was restored as full avocat of Saint-Trond after Udo died][19]. Kupper suggests that the following entry refers to Udo Graaf van Limburg[20]: the necrology of Prüm records the death in 1078 of “Udo comes”[21]. This date appears incompatible with Udo’s earlier loss of the advocacy, unless this was due to long-term incapacity before death or, assuming that Alternative (1) of Udo’s possible marriages shown below is correct, the death of his wife which would presumably have removed Udo’s legitimacy as Duke Frédéric’s successor.
     "The question of Udo’s possible marriage is speculative: it is not indicated directly in any surviving primary source. As explained in detail further below, two possible alternative cases may explain the ancestry of Udo’s successor, Hendrik [I] Graaf van Limburg. In each case, a possible marriage of Udo forms part of the overall picture and may help explain the hypotheses.
     "Under Alternative (1), Hendrik [I] would have been the son of Waléran [II] Comte d’Arlon. Consistent with this alternative, an explanation is needed for Hendrik’s predecessor in Limburg, Udo, succeeding Frédéric de Luxembourg Duke of Lower Lotharingia both in Limburg and in the advocacy of Saint-Trond. A marriage between Udo and an otherwise unrecorded older daughter of Duke Frédéric provides one possible explanation. If that is correct, Udo would have married before he was named at Limburg in 1061, and presumably his supposed wife would still have been alive in 1065 when Udo succeeded as avocat of Saint-Trond. For hyperlinking purposes only, this case would be: m ([before 1061]) --- de Luxembourg, daughter of Frédéric Duke of Lower Lotharingia [Luxembourg] & his first wife Gerberge de Boulogne ([1030/45]-after 1065).
     "Under Alternative (2), Hendrik would have been the son of Jutta [Judith], known daughter of Frédéric de Luxembourg Duke of Lower Lotharingia, by an unknown husband. Kupper suggests that Udo Graaf van Limburg was the unknown husband[22]. For hyperlinking purposes only, this case would be: m Jutta [Judith] de Luxembourg, daughter of Frédéric Duke of Lower Lotharingia [Luxembourg] & his first wife Gerberge de Boulogne. Kupper’s hypothesis is not entirely satisfactory. While this possible identification is an obvious one as Udo was Hendrik’s immediate predecessor in Limburg, Hendrik inherited Limburg from his mother whoever his father was. In addition, the absence of the name Udo among Hendrik’s known descendants also appears to suggest some doubt about his possible identification as Jutta’s husband. A further point is that, after Udo died, Hendrik did not inherit the advocacy of Saint-Trond, which passed to Otto de Looz Comte de Duras. The advocacy in fact passed from Otto’s son Giselbert to Hendrik’s son Walram in [1124/27], which suggests the resolution of a long-standing dispute which may be understandable if Hendrik’s right was not inherited from Udo in a direct line."
Med Lands cites:

     Joatte (?) Grafin von Salm died after 1244.¹
     She was living in 1244.¹

     Laurette von Salm died after 1244.¹
     She was living in 1244.¹

      ; a nun at Remiremont.¹

     Simon I (?) Graf von Salm married Mathilde (?) von Saarbrücken, daughter of Simon von Saarbrücken and Margherita (?) de Savoy, in 1334
; her 1st husband.²
Simon I (?) Graf von Salm died in 1346 at Coucy, Ardennes, France; killed in battle.¹
      ; Gf Simon I von Salm, +k.a.Coucy 1346; m.1334 Matilda von Saarbrücken.¹

     Mathilde (?) von Saarbrücken married Simon I (?) Graf von Salm, son of Johann I (?) Graf von Ober-Salm and Joan (Jeanne) de Joinville, in 1334
; her 1st husband.¹ Mathilde (?) von Saarbrücken married Johann (?) after 1346
; her 2nd husband.¹
Mathilde (?) von Saarbrücken died after 1347.¹
      ; Mathilde von Saarbrücken, fl 1347; 1m: 1334 Ct Simon I von Salm (+1346); 2m: Johann N.¹ She was living in 1347.¹

     Johann (?) married Mathilde (?) von Saarbrücken, daughter of Simon von Saarbrücken and Margherita (?) de Savoy, after 1346
; her 2nd husband.¹

     Archambaud de Meaux Archbishop of Sens died on 29 August 968.¹
Archambaud de Meaux Archbishop of Sens was buried after 29 August 968 at Saint-Pierre-le-Vif, Sens, Departement de l'Yonne, Bourgogne, France.¹
      ; Per Med Lands:
     "[ARCHAMBAUD (-29 Aug 968, bur Sens Saint-Pierre-le-Vif). Archbishop of Sens 959. The Chronicon Sancti Petri Vivi Senonensis records that “Archembaldus” was installed as archbishop “V Kal Jul”, in 959 from the context[49]. According to Gallia Christiana[50], Archambaud Archbishop of Sens was the son of Robert Comte de Troyes and his wife Adelais de Bourgogne. This may be based on the Chronicon Sancti Petri Vivi Senonensis which records the death “in…mense Augusto” (in 968 from the context) of “pater ipsius Rotbertus…vir nobilis”, referring to archbishop Archambaud[51], assuming that this refers to Robert Comte de Troyes whose activities are recorded earlier in the same source. However, the chronology is unfavourable for this parentage to be correct. The Chronicon Sancti Petri Vivi Senonensis records the death “IV Kal Sep” (in 968 from the context) of “Archembaldus Archiepiscopus…adhuc iuvenis” and his burial “in basilica beati Petri”[52]. Although stated to be “iuvenis” when he died, he must have been a young child when installed as archbishop if the estimated dates of marriage and birth of the members of Comte Robert’s family are correct. His extreme youth at the time of his appointment is not commented on in the sources so far consulted. In any case, the name Archambaud is not otherwise found in the family of the comtes de Vermandois, which also suggests that the suggested parentage might not be correct.]"
Med lands cites:

     Adelheid of Upper Lorraine (?) married Walram/Valeran I (?) Count of Lower Lorraine, Ct of Limburg and Arlon, son of Conrad (?) Count d'Arlon.^1,2,4,5
Adelheid of Upper Lorraine (?) was born circa 995; Genealogy.EU says b. bef 0995; Med Lands says b. 0995-1015.^4,2
Adelheid of Upper Lorraine (?) died after 1032.⁴
      ; Per Racines et Histoire: "Walraven (Walram, Waleran) 1er de Basse-Lorraine ° ~972 ? + 1052 comte de Limbourg et d’Arlon
     ép. Adalheid de Haute-Lorraine."⁶

; Per Med Lands:
     "WALERAN [I] (-before 1032). Comte d'Arlon. Eberhard Archbishop of Trier refers to past donations by "comite Walrammo de Arlo et uxore ipsius Adelheide" in two charters dated 1052 and 1053, the second one referring to the confirmation of donations by "filiorum eorum Walrammi et Folconis" after the death of their parents[9], which appears to pull all the information together. The primary source which confirms that Waléran died before 1032 has not been identified: presumably it relates to a charter recording his widow’s donation to Trier (noted in the Gesta Treverorum quoted below) which has not been identified.
     "m ADELAIS de Lotharingia, daughter of THIERRY Duke of Upper Lotharingia [Wigeriche] & his wife Richilde --- ([995/1005]-after 1032). The Chronicon Sancti Huberti names "Adeladis comitissa Araeleonis" as daughter of "ducis Theoderici, soror Sigifridi [=error for Frederici] patris marchissæ Beatricis" (although the name of her husband is not specified), when recounting the story of her cubicularius having been bitten by a rabid dog[10]. The Gesta Treverorum records that "comitissa de castello…Aralunæ, mater...comitum Walramni et Folconis”, after her husband died (“marito suo defuncto”), donated her property to Trier, with the consent of her sons and daughters (“astipulantibus filiis et filiabus suis")[11]. The Chronicle of Alberic de Trois-Fontaines names “Adela comitissa Arelung vel Areleonis...soror Sigifridi [error for Friderici] filia...ducis Theoderici” and her two sons “Fulconem et Galeranum” Eberhard Archbishop of Trier refers to past donations by "comite Walrammo de Arlo et uxore ipsius Adelheide" in two charters dated 1052 and 1053, the second one referring to the confirmation of donations by "filiorum eorum Walrammi et Folconis" after the death of their parents[12], which appears to pull all the information together. Her birth date is estimated very approximately in order to test the chronology of her descendants, bearing in mind her husband’s supposed date of death. "
Med Lands cites:

; Per Genealogy.EU (Luxemburg 1): “C2. Adela of Lorraine, +by 995; m. [?] Ct Walram I of Arlon (+after 1052); they had a son, Ct Walram II of Arlon, whose daughter married Ct Heinrich of Limburg, and carried most of the Limburg lands into that family; see http://genealogy.euweb.cz/luxemburg/luxemburg8.html#H1”.² GAV-27.

; Per Med Lands:
     "ADELAIS ([995/1015]-after 1032). The Chronicon Sancti Huberti names "Adeladis comitissa Araeleonis" as daughter of "ducis Theoderici, soror Sigifridi [=error for Frederici] patris marchissæ Beatricis" (although the name of her husband is not specified) when recounting the story of her cubicularius having been bitten by a rabid dog[168]. The Gesta Treverorum refers to "comitissa de castello…Aralunæ, mater comitum Walrammi et Folconis, marito suo defuncto, astipulantibus filiis et filiabus suis", but does not name her or specify her origin[169]. Eberhard Archbishop of Trier refers to past donations by "comite Walrammo de Arlo et uxore ipsius Adelheide" in two charters dated 1052 and 1053, the second one referring to the confirmation of donations by "filiorum eorum Walrammi et Folconis" after the death of their parents[170], which appears to pull all the information together. Her birth date is estimated very approximately in order to test the chronology of her descendants, bearing in mind her husband’s supposed date of death.
     "m WALERAN [I] Comte d'Arlon, son of --- (-before 1032)."
Med Lands cites: Adelheid of Upper Lorraine (?) was also known as Adela of Lorraine.² Adelheid of Upper Lorraine (?) was also known as Adela de Bar.²

; Per Genealogy.EU (Luxemburg 1): "Adela of Lorraine, +by 995; m. Ct Walram I of Arlon (+after 1052); they had a son, Ct Walram II of Arlon, whose daughter married Ct Heinrich of Limburg, and carried most of the Limburg lands into that family"
Per Genealogy.EU (Luxemburg 8): "Ct Walraven I of Lower Lorraine, Ct of Limburg and Arlon, *ca 972, +1052; m.Adelheid of Upper Lorraine."^2,1

     Adelaide von Pottenstein married Heinrich I von Limburg Graf von Limburg, Duke of Lower Lotharingia, son of Walram/Valeran II (?) Count of Lower Lorraine, Ct of Limburg and Arlon and Jutta (?) of Luxemburg,
; his 2nd wife.^1,2,6,7 Adelaide von Pottenstein was born circa 1061.¹
Adelaide von Pottenstein died circa 1106; Genealogy.EU says d. ca 1106; Med Lands says d. aft 1107; Med Lands says d. aft 13 Aug 1106.^1,4,2
     ; Per Racines et Histoire: "? d’Arlon + après 1081 héritière du Limbourg
     ép. Hendrik (1° van Limburg) ° ~1059 + 1119 graaf van Limburg, comte d’Arlon (1070-1119), créé, par l’Empereur Heinrich III, Heinrich 1°, duc de Basse-Lorraine (1101-1106, déchu par l’Empereur, le château de Limbourg ruiné), conseiller influent de l’Empereur Heinrich III (IV, Roi de Germanie) (possible fils d’Udo et de Judith von Salm, d’après Europäische Stammtafeln ; Hendrik ép. 2) Adelheid von Botenstein ° ~1061 + après 13/08/1106 (fille de Botho, graf von Botenstein, et de Judith von Schweinfurt.)⁸"

; Per Med Lands:
     "HENDRIK [I] van Limburg, son of WALERAN [II] Comte d’Arlon & his wife Jutta [Judith] de Luxembourg ([before 1060]-1119). Hendrik’s birth date is estimated on the assumption that he was adult when named for the first time in 1081 (see below). This date is also consistent with the birth of Hendrik’s children in the likely range [1080/95]. Graaf van Limburg. The Gesta Episcoporum Leodiensium names “comes Henricus de Lemburch” among those present at Liège 27 Mar 1081 when the bishop of Liège made peace with Heinrich IV King of Germany[29]. ["…Heinricus dux de Lemburg…" subscribed the charter dated 1093 under which "Heinricus…comes palatinus Rheni et dominus de Lacu…uxore mei Adleide" founded the abbey of Laach[30], although the naming of other witnesses suggests that this charter is spurious.] The Annalista Saxo records that "Heinricus comes de Lintburh cum Theoderico comite" rebelled against Emperor Heinrich in 1101, the castle of Limburg being captured and destroyed by imperial forces[31]. Emperor Heinrich III installed him as HENRI I Duke of Lower Lotharingia in late 1101: the Annalista Saxo records that the emperor celebrated Christmas at Mainz where "Heinricus comes de Lintburh dux effectus est"[32]. The Annalista Saxo records that he was deposed as duke in 1106 by Heinrich V King of Germany after rebelling again[33]. Sigebert records that “Heinricus exdux” occupied Aachen in 1107 in opposition to the newly appointed “dux Godefridus”, that “Heinricus cum filiis suis” escaped but that “uxorem eius” was captured[34]. The Chronicon rythmicum Leodiense records Hendrik’s death in 1119[35].
     "m ADELHEID von Botenstein, daughter of BOTHO Graf von Botenstein & his wife Judith von Schweinfurt (-after [1107]). The Annalista Saxo records that “Otto de Suinvorde” married "Emilias vel Immula seu Irmingardis...sororque illius Adelas dicta nupserat Ottoni marchioni de Italia", by whom he had “...Iudhita...” who married firstly “Cononi duci Bawariorum” and secondly “Bodo quidam nobilis”, giving birth by her second husband to “Adelheidem” who by “Heinricus dux de Lintburch” had “Walramonum ducem qui et Paginus dicebatur, et filias duas...”[36]. The identity of Adelheid’s father is indicated by Ekkehard who names "duo fratres Aerbo…et Boto paterno de sanguine Noricæ gentis…Hartwici palatini comitis filii"[37], read together with the charter dated 2 Sep 1094 under which Emperor Heinrich IV confirmed the donation of "villa Rounueld…in pago Vueringeon in comitatu Vueringeri" made by "Boto Noricus natione vivens Bauarica…coniugis sue Iudithæ"[38]. A charter of Embricho Bishop of Würzburg dated 10 Jul 1136 records that serfs (“Sasso et soror ipsius Gerberc...”) testified that “neptis ipsius ducis [=Ottonis de Svinfurde] domina Adelheit, filia comitis Bodonis et uxor ducis Heinrici de Linburc” had arranged the burial of “matrem istorum” at Würzburg St Stefan[39]. Sigebert records that “Heinricus exdux” occupied Aachen in 1107 in opposition to the newly appointed “dux Godefridus”, that “Heinricus cum filiis suis” escaped but that “uxorem eius” was captured[40]. "
Med Lands cites:

Reference: Genealogics cites:
     1. Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag, Marburg, Schwennicke, Detlev (Ed.) 6:26
     2. Mutterstämme. Neue Wege für Verebungs- u nd Familienforschung. Leuschner & Lubensky, Graz 1924, Dungern, Otto Karl Ludwig. 33.² EDV-27. Adelaide von Pottenstein was also known as Adelheid von Bottenstein.^4,7

; Per Genealogy.EU: "Adelaide (*ca 1061 +ca 1106), dau.of Botho von Pottenstein."¹

; Per Med Lands:
     "ADELHEID (-after [1107]). The Annalista Saxo records that “...Iudhita...” married secondly “Bodo quidam nobilis”, by whom she had “Adelheidem” who by “Heinricus dux de Lintburch” had “Walramonum ducem qui et Paginus dicebatur, et filias duas...”[791]. The identity of Adelheid’s father is indicated by the extract from Ekkehard and the charter dated 2 Sep 1094 quoted above. A charter of Embricho Bishop of Würzburg dated 10 Jul 1136 records that serfs (“Sasso et soror ipsius Gerberc...”) testified that “neptis ipsius ducis [=Ottonis de Svinfurde] domina Adelheit, filia comitis Bodonis et uxor ducis Heinrici de Linburc” had arranged the burial of “matrem istorum” at Würzburg St Stefan[792]. Sigebert records that “Heinricus exdux” occupied Aachen in 1107 in opposition to the newly appointed “dux Godefridus”, that “Heinricus cum filiis suis” escaped but that “uxorem eius” was captured[793]. The question of her husband’s possible alternative ancestries is discussed in the document LIMBURG.
     "m HENDRIK [I] Graf van Limburg, son of [WALERAN [II] Comte d’Arlon & his wife Jutta [Judith] de Luxembourg] ([before 1060]-1119). He was installed as HENRI I Duke of Lower Lotharingia in 1101."
Med Lands cites:

     Konrad I (?) von Merheim was born circa 1055.¹
Konrad I (?) von Merheim died after 1088.¹

     Gerhard I (?) Herr von Wassenberg married Elisabeth (?)¹

Gerhard I (?) Herr von Wassenberg died after 1166.¹
     He was living between 1148 and 1166.¹

     Walram IV (?) Margrave of Arlon died after 25 December 1145.¹

     Adelheid von Limburg married Ekbert von Tecklenburg Graf von Tecklenburg, son of NN von Tecklenburg and Gisela (?) de Lorraine,
;
His 1st wife.^1,2,5,6,4
Adelheid von Limburg died between 1150 and 1151.⁴
      ; a daughter; m. Gf Ekbert von Tecklenburg.¹

; Per Med Lands:
     "daughter (-[1150/Jun 1151]). Her parentage and marriage are confirmed by the charter dated 1151 under which Henri Bishop of Liège confirmed the donations by "domina Jutta, nobilissima matrona uxor ducis Walrami de Lemburg" to Rolduc [Rode] abbey, which records the presence at her burial in Rolduc [Rode] of "…Arnoldus quoque filius Ruberti comitis de Lunneburg natus ex domina Beatrice filia præfatæ dominæ, et Theodericus filius Ekberti comitis de Titkelenburg natus ex alia filia"[85]. A charter dated 1150 confirms a donation to the church of Osnabrück by "Henricus comes de Tekeneborch et fratres sui coheredes eius Otto, Thidericus et Gerhardus", with the consent of "matris eorum Athelheidis"[86].
     "m EKBERT Graf von Tecklenburg, son of --- [von Tecklenburg] & his wife Gisela --- (-4 Feb [1146/50])."
Med Lands cites:

; Per Med Lands:
     "EKBERT (-4 Feb [1146/50]). The primary source which confirms his parentage has not yet been identified. Graf von Tecklenburg 1139.
     "m ADELHEID van Limburg, daughter of WALRAM [II] Graaf van Limburg & his wife Jutta van Gelderland (-[1150/Jun 1151]). A charter dated 1150 confirms a donation to the church of Osnabrück by "Henricus comes de Tekeneborch et fratres sui coheredes eius Otto, Thidericus et Gerhardus", with the consent of "matris eorum Athelheidis"[2899]. Her parentage and marriage are confirmed by the charter dated 1151 under which Henri Bishop of Liège confirmed the donations by "domina Jutta, nobilissima matrona uxor ducis Walrami de Lemburg" to Rolduc abbey, which records the presence at her burial in Rolduc of "…Arnoldus quoque filius Ruberti comitis de Lunneburg natus ex domina Beatrice filia præfatæ dominæ, et Theodericus filius Ekberti comitis de Titkelenburg natus ex alia filia"[2900]."
Med Lands cites:
; Per Genealogy.EU (Tecklenburg): “A2. Gf Ekbert von Tecklenburg, +4.2.1146/50; 1m: N, a dau.of Gf Walram of Limburg; 2m: Adelaide of Geldern (+after 1150)”.⁷

     Ekbert von Tecklenburg Graf von Tecklenburg married Adelheid von Limburg, daughter of Walram/Valeran III Paganus (?) Graf von Limburg, Graf von Arlon, Duke of Lower Lotharingia and Jutta van Wassenberg Heiress of Wassenberg,
;
His 1st wife.^1,5,2,3,6 Ekbert von Tecklenburg Graf von Tecklenburg married Adelheid von Wassenberg, daughter of Gerhard II van Wassenberg Graaf van Gelre and Ermgard von Zutphen Heiress of Zutphen,
;
His 2nd wife.⁷ Ekbert von Tecklenburg Graf von Tecklenburg was born circa 1090.²
Ekbert von Tecklenburg Graf von Tecklenburg died between 4 February 1146 and 1150.^2,3
      ; Per Med Lands:
     "daughter (-[1150/Jun 1151]). Her parentage and marriage are confirmed by the charter dated 1151 under which Henri Bishop of Liège confirmed the donations by "domina Jutta, nobilissima matrona uxor ducis Walrami de Lemburg" to Rolduc [Rode] abbey, which records the presence at her burial in Rolduc [Rode] of "…Arnoldus quoque filius Ruberti comitis de Lunneburg natus ex domina Beatrice filia præfatæ dominæ, et Theodericus filius Ekberti comitis de Titkelenburg natus ex alia filia"[85]. A charter dated 1150 confirms a donation to the church of Osnabrück by "Henricus comes de Tekeneborch et fratres sui coheredes eius Otto, Thidericus et Gerhardus", with the consent of "matris eorum Athelheidis"[86].
     "m EKBERT Graf von Tecklenburg, son of --- [von Tecklenburg] & his wife Gisela --- (-4 Feb [1146/50])."
Med Lands cites:

Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag, Marburg, Schwennicke, Detlev (Ed.) 8:101.²

; NB: Genealogics mentions Ekbert's marriage to Adellheid von Limburg in a note, but shows his marriage to Adelheid von Wassenberg as his main marriage and attributes his son to her. Med Lands only shows one marriage, to Adelheid von Limburg, and attributes Exbert's son to her. I have shown both marriages, and have followed Genealogics in attributing Heinrich (his son) to the first (to Adelheid von Limburg. GA Vaut.^3,2,8

; Per Genealogics:
     "Ekbert, Graf von Tecklenburg, was born about 1090, the son of a count from the house of Saarbrücken and Gisela de Lorraine. He first married a daughter of Walram III Paganus, Graf von Limburg, Graf von Arlon, and Judith van Wassenberg, heiress of Wassenberg. They had a son Dietrich who became a priest. After the death of his first wife, Ekbert married Adelheid van Wassenberg, daughter of Gerhard van Wassenberg and Ermgard von Zutphen, heiress of Zutphen. His father-in-law and his former mother-in-law were siblings. Ekbert and Ermgard had two sons of whom Heinrich I would have progeny; Gerhard became a priest.
     "Ekbert was a Saxon vassal, and he was count from 1127. In 1139 he was part heir of his mother-in-law Ermgard's brother Heinrich I, Graf von Zutphen. From then he called himself after the castle of Tecklenburg, and claimed the position of the old line of the counts of Zutphen, which had died out with Heinrich.
     "The dispute, partly over this inheritance, with the counts of Ravensberg and Oldenburg, and another with the bishops of Osnabrück and Münster, was decisive for his house. In addition to the main legal instruments for the establishment of territorial sovereignty, the stewardship of Münster, and the vice-stewardship in the Osnabrück north land and of the abbey of Corvey, he also possessed several free seats (Freistühle), jurisdictions answerable directly to the emperor.
     "Ekbert died about 1150."²

; Per Med Lands:
     "EKBERT (-4 Feb [1146/50]). The primary source which confirms his parentage has not yet been identified. Graf von Tecklenburg 1139.
     "m ADELHEID van Limburg, daughter of WALRAM [II] Graaf van Limburg & his wife Jutta van Gelderland (-[1150/Jun 1151]). A charter dated 1150 confirms a donation to the church of Osnabrück by "Henricus comes de Tekeneborch et fratres sui coheredes eius Otto, Thidericus et Gerhardus", with the consent of "matris eorum Athelheidis"[2899]. Her parentage and marriage are confirmed by the charter dated 1151 under which Henri Bishop of Liège confirmed the donations by "domina Jutta, nobilissima matrona uxor ducis Walrami de Lemburg" to Rolduc abbey, which records the presence at her burial in Rolduc of "…Arnoldus quoque filius Ruberti comitis de Lunneburg natus ex domina Beatrice filia præfatæ dominæ, et Theodericus filius Ekberti comitis de Titkelenburg natus ex alia filia"[2900]."
Med Lands cites:

; Per Genealogy.EU (Tecklenburg): “A2. Gf Ekbert von Tecklenburg, +4.2.1146/50; 1m: N, a dau.of Gf Walram of Limburg; 2m: Adelaide of Geldern (+after 1150)”.⁴

; Per Genealogy.EU (Geldern-Heinsberg): “D2. Adelheid, +after 1150; m.Gf Ekbert von Tecklenburg (+4.2.1146/50)”.⁹

     Agnes (?) von Limburg married Walo (?) von Veckenstedt.^1,2

Agnes (?) von Limburg died in 1136.¹
      ; Agnes, +1136; 1m: Friedrich von Putelendorf (+1125); 2m: Walo von Veckenstedt (+1126.)¹

     Heinrich (?) von Putelendorf, Pfalzgraf von Sachsen died in 1126.¹

     Walo (?) von Veckenstedt married Agnes (?) von Limburg, daughter of Walram/Valeran III Paganus (?) Graf von Limburg, Graf von Arlon, Duke of Lower Lotharingia and Jutta van Wassenberg Heiress of Wassenberg.^1,2

Walo (?) von Veckenstedt died in 1126.¹

     Henry (?) Lord of Wassenberg died in 1214.¹
     Henry (?) Lord of Wassenberg was also known as Hendrik van Limburg Herr of Wassenberg.³

     Simon van Limburg Cardinal, Elect of Liége was born in 1178.¹
Simon van Limburg Cardinal, Elect of Liége died in 1195.¹

     Frederick de Lumain married unknown (?) of Lummen, daughter of Louis (?) de Lummen.¹

Frederick de Lumain died between 1211 and 1212.¹
     Frederick de Lumain was also known as Frederik van Limburg.