Person Page - 2071

     Willelme (?) married GuyGuigues II d'Albon Comte de Lyon et de Forez, son of Guy/Guigues d'Albon Comte de Lyon et de Forez and Alix/Marie (?) de Beaujeu.¹

      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III/4 739.¹

     Guy III d'Albon Comte de Forez married Ascuraa (?)⁴
Guy III d'Albon Comte de Forez married Adalasia (?)⁵

Guy III d'Albon Comte de Forez died on 28 November 1204 at Akkon, Palestine.¹
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III/4 739.¹

     Ascuraa (?) married Guy III d'Albon Comte de Forez, son of GuyGuigues II d'Albon Comte de Lyon et de Forez and Willelme (?).¹

      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III 739.¹

     Eléonore d'Albon married Sir Guillaume de Baffie Knt.²

      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III 739, 739.¹

     Sir Guillaume de Baffie Knt. married Eléonore d'Albon, daughter of Guy III d'Albon Comte de Forez and Ascuraa (?).¹

Sir Guillaume de Baffie Knt. died after 1255.¹
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III 739, 739.¹

     Adalasia (?) married Guy III d'Albon Comte de Forez, son of GuyGuigues II d'Albon Comte de Lyon et de Forez and Willelme (?).¹

Adalasia (?) died before 1222.¹
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III/4 739.¹

     Alix Guigonne de Forez married Gerard II de Vienne Comte de Macon et de Vienne, son of Guillaume IV/V de Vienne Comte de Macon et de Vienne and Scholastica (?) de Champagne, in 1220.^2,3

Alix Guigonne de Forez died after 1239.¹
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III/1 122; III/4 739.¹

     Gerard II de Vienne Comte de Macon et de Vienne married Alix Guigonne de Forez, daughter of Guy III d'Albon Comte de Forez and Adalasia (?), in 1220.^1,2

Gerard II de Vienne Comte de Macon et de Vienne died before 1224.^1,2
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III/1 122.¹

     Eléonore d'Albon married Guillaume IX d'Auvergne Comte d'Auvergne, son of Guy II d'Auvergne Comte d'Auvergne and Pernelle de Chambon Dame de Combrailles, between 1206 and 1210
;
His 1st (?) wife.
NB: Genealogics shows a marriage between Eléonore and Guillaume. However, Med Lands only shows them to have been "betrothed".^2,3,4
     ; Per Med Lands:
     "GUILLAUME [X] d’Auvergne, son of GUY [II] Comte d'Auvergne & his wife Petronille de Chambon (-1246, bur Le Bouchet). The Chronicle of Alberic de Trois-Fontaines records that "iunior comes Alvernie Guilelmus" was son of “comitis Guidonis Alvernie” and his wife "soror abbatis Radulfi…Camboniam"[281]. "Guido comes Claromontensis" donated "Buillonem…et Leez…et Buisseroles…" to "Petronillæ dominiæ Chambonii uxori meæ comitissæ Clarimontensis in dotalicio" on leaving for "partes Albigenses…contra hæreticos", with the consent of "Guillelmus primogenitus meus […matri suæ]", by charter dated 1209[282]. The testament of "Guidonis comitis Arvernorum", dated 27 May 1209, names "Guillelmo primogenito suo…Hugo secundus natu…Petronillæ uxoris suæ…Guidoni…tertio filio suo"[283]. Comte d'Auvergne. Henry III King of England recorded a treaty with "W. filium comitis Guidonis de Alvernia et Delfinum Clari Montis et R. nepotem eius" dated [Oct] 1225[284]. The testament of "Guillermus comes Claromontensis", dated Feb 1245, chooses burial "in monasterio del Boschet in sepulcro bonæ memoriæ patris nostri", appoints "Robertum filium nostrum…sub custodia…Hugonis…episcopi Claromontensis consanguinei nostri" as his heir, names "Guidonem filium nostrum clericum…Guillermum et Godefridum filios nostros…Henricum filium nostrum", provides for the anniversary of "sororis nostræ et…generis nostri Guillelmo de Ussone" and makes various other donations including to "domui de las Chesas…ad vitam sororis nostræ"[285].
     "Betrothed (Apr 1202) to --- de Montluçon, daughter of ARCHAMBAUD Seigneur de Montluçon & his wife ---. A charter dated Apr 1202 records an agreement between “Archembaudus dominus Montis Lucii” and “Guidonem comitem Arvernie" for the marriage of "filiam Archembaudi primogenitam" and "Guillelmus filius comitis, vel alter filius", together with "Combralium et comitatum"[286].
     "Betrothed ([1210]) to [ELEONORE] de Forez, daughter of GUY [III] Comte de Forez & his second wife Alix ---. La Mure states that "la troisième et dernière fille de Guy III Comte de Forez et de son épouse Alice de Suilly" was "Eléonor de Forez" who, in a charter "alléguée par Justel de l’an 1210", was betrothed to "Guillaume fils de Guy II Comte d’Auvergne", that the betrothal was terminated "par le changement des affaires qui survint ès Maisons d’Auvergne et de Forez", and that the same daughter later married "un grand seigneur d’Auvergne nommé Guillaume de Baffie, seigneur de Baffie et de Viveron"[287]. In this way, La Mure conflates the daughter of Comte Guy [III] by his first marriage, who married Guillaume de Baffie as demonstrated by the charter dated Mar [1241/42] quoted above, with his younger daughter who was betrothed to Guillaume d’Auvergne. This must be incorrect in light of the source which names the older daughter, wife of Guillaume de Baffie, as "S" (see SEIGNEURS de BAFFIE, below). In an earlier passage, La Mure describes the background to this betrothal: Philippe II King of France had dispossessed Guy [II] of his county in 1210 in reprisal for his persecution of his brother Robert Bishop of Clermont, Guy de Dampierre Seigneur de Bourbon supported the king in this move, while the county of Forez supported the comte d’Auvergne[288]. The agreement is confirmed in the undated charter which records that "Reginaldus…primæ Lugdunensis ecclesiæ minister…et pater meus comes Forensis et Guido comes Arverniæ" agreed the marriages, firstly of "G. fratris mei" and "filias G. comitis Arverniæ", and secondly of "filius…dicti comitis Arverniæ" and "filiam […reliquæ filiæ fratris mei] fratris mei G. quondam comitis Forensis"[289]. This charter makes it clear that this daughter was the last remaining (unmarried) daughter ("reliquæ filiæ") of Comte Guy [III], but the document does not name her. La Mure gives no indication of the basis on which he names her "Eléonor", but presumably his source was Justel’s Histoire d’Auvergne (not yet consulted). No record has been found which indicates that this betrothal was ever finalised into a marriage, although the late date of Guillaume [X]’s recorded marriage suggests that he may have been married before and remarried only after the death of his earlier wife, who would presumably have died childless.
     "m (before 3 Feb 1225) as her second husband, ALEIDIS de Brabant, widow of ARNOLD [III] Graf van Looz en Rieneck, daughter of HENRI I Duke of Brabant & his first wife Mathilde de Flandre (-[1261/67]). The Genealogia Ducum Brabantiæ Heredum Franciæ refers to the third of the four daughters of "Henricus dux" as the wife of "comes de Alvernia" and mother of "Robertum comitem Bolonie et Alvernie et fratres eius et sorores"[290]. The Oude Kronik van Brabant names "Mariam, conthoralem Ottonis Quartus Romanorum imperatoris, Aleydam comitissam Auernie, Margaretam comitissam Gerardi comitis Ghelrie et Mechteldim, primo quidem comitissam Palatinam Rheni, postea…comitissam Hollandie" as the daughters of "Henricus…primus, dux Lotharingie" and his wife "Mechteldim, filiam Mathei Boloniensis comitis"[291]. "Willelmus…comes Arverniæ et Aleydis quondam comitissa de Los" renounced an inheritance from "dominus dux Lotharingiæ", presumably in connection with their forthcoming marriage although the document does not specify this, by charter dated 1 Feb 1224[292]. She married thirdly (before Dec 1251) as his second wife, Arnold [III] Heer van Wesemaal Marshall of Brabant. "Robertus comes Claremontis et Alverniæ, Aleydis mater eius, et Arnoldus dominus de Wensemale maritus" confirmed agreement concerning property by charter dated 1251[293]. Her third marriage is confirmed by a letter dated 1260 from "Ernoul chevalier Sire de Wesemale et Alys que fu contesse d’Auvergne sa femme" granted their rights in the county of Boulogne to "nostre cousine germaine la contesse Mahaut de Boloigne"[294]."
Med Lands cites:

Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III 739.³

      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XI 156.¹

     Kunigundis (?) married Count Nivelung (?)^2,1

     GAV-33.

; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIV 56.¹

     Count Nivelung (?) married Kunigundis (?)^1,2

     GAV-33.

; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIV 56.¹

     Almodis (?) married Umbald de Sully, son of Archembaud II (?) Sire de Sully and Agnes (?).¹

     GAV-30.

; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIV 56.¹

     Guillaume de Jaligny seigneur de Souvigny-Jaligny was born circa 1060.² He married Ermengarde de Bourbon, daughter of Archambaud IV ' Le Fort' de Bourbon seigneur de Bourbon and Béliarde (?), circa 1082
;
Her 2nd husband.^2,4,5,6,3
     ; Per Racines et Histoire (Bourbon Ancien): “Ermengarde de Bourbon ° ~1055/60 + avant 1087
     ép. 1) 1070 (div.) Foulques IV «Le Réchin», comte de Tours (1060) Gâtinais (1060-1069) et d’Anjou (1068) ° ~1043 (Château-Landon) + 14 ou 21/04/1109
     ép. 2) ~1082 Guillaume, seigneur de SouvignyJuligny ° ~1060”.⁷
; Per Med Lands:
     "ERMENGARDE de Bourbon . The Gesta Consulum Andegavensium names "Ermengardim filiam Archenbaldi Fortis de Borbone" as second wife of "Fulco Rechin", recording that he divorced her[80]. The Gesta Consulum Andegavensium names her second husband "Guillelmo Jalinniaci ortam" when recording the marriage of her daughter by this second marriage[81]. The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Willelmo Jalinacensi domino filio Uldini Barbæ" as the second husband of "Ermengardim filiam Archembaudi Fortis de Borbono"[82].
     "m firstly (1070, divorced before 1076) as his second wife, FOULQUES IV "le Réchin" Comte d'Anjou, son of GEOFFROY II Comte de Gâtinais, Seigneur de Château-Landon & his wife Ermengarde d'Anjou (1043-14 Apr 1109).
     "m secondly GUILLAUME Seigneur de Jaligny, son of ELDIN de Jaligny & his wife ---. "
Med Lands cites: GAV-28.

Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIV 56.⁶

; Per Med Lands:
     "GUILLAUME de Jaligny . Seigneur de Jaligny. The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Willelmo Jalinacensi domino filio Uldini Barbæ" as the second husband of "Ermengardim filiam Archembaudi Fortis de Borbono"[316]. Presumed relatives of this Jaligny family are named in a charter dated 1056 under which "Falco de Ialiniaco" donated property to Tournus abbey "per manum domni Willelmi fratris mei", with the consent of "uxore mea Beatrice…filiis meis Gulferio atque Itherio", subscribed by "Armanni monachi filii vicecomitis de Polognac…"[317].
     "m as her second husband, ERMENGARDE de Bourbon, divorced wife of FOULQUES IV "le Réchin" Comte d'Anjou, daughter of ARCHAMBAUD [IV] "le Fort" Seigneur de Bourbon & his wife Béliarde ---. The Gesta Consulum Andegavensium names "Ermengardim filiam Archenbaldi Fortis de Borbone" as second wife of "Fulco Rechin", recording that he divorced her[318]. The Gesta Consulum Andegavensium names her second husband "Guillelmo Jalinniaci ortam" when recording the marriage of her daughter by this second marriage[319]. The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Willelmo Jalinacensi domino filio Uldini Barbæ" as the second husband of "Ermengardim filiam Archembaudi Fortis de Borbono"[320]."
Med Lands cites:

     Elisabeth/Isabelle (?) Dame de Jaligny-en-Bourbonnais was born circa 1085.² She married Hugues I (?) seigneur d'Amboise, de Chaumont-sur-Loire et de, son of Sulpice I (?) chatelain d'Amboise, seigneur de Chaumont and Denise (?) de Fougeres, in 1103.^{1,2,5,3,7,10,11}

Elisabeth/Isabelle (?) Dame de Jaligny-en-Bourbonnais died on 12 October 1154.^3,5,7
     GAV-27.

Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIII 1.³

; Per Med Lands:
     "ELISABETH de Jaligny (-12 Oct 1154, bur Pontlevoy). The Gesta Consulum Andegavensium records that "Gosfridum Martellum" arranged the marriage of "Elisabeth sororem suam ex matre sua et Guillelmo Jalinniaci ortam" and "Hugoni de Calvo Monte" and gave "Ambaziacum" as her dowry[323], although this contradicts the Gesta Ambaziensium which records that Amboise came into the family with the mother of Sulpice [I]. “Hugo filius Sulpicii de Caluomonte” relinquished claims to “domum apud Blesis” in favour of Marmoutier, with the consent of “Elysabeth uxor ipsius Hugonis...et Sulpitius filius eius”, in the presence of “...Hugo filius Ebrardi de Ambaziaco...”, by charter dated 1108[324]. The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Elisabeth sororem suam [Uldini]" as the wife of "Hugonis…Supplicium primogenitum"[325].
     "m ([1103]) HUGUES [I] de Chaumont, son of SULPICE [I] Seigneur d'Amboise & his wife Denise [de Fougères] (-Jerusalem 24 Jul [1129/30], bur Jerusalem Mount Olives)."
Med Lands cites:

; Per Racines et Histoire (Amboise): “Hugues 1er (ou II) d’Amboise + 24/06 ou 07?/1129/30 (Jérusalem ; croisé : 1096 & ~1128) seul seigneur d’Amboise, Jaligny, Chaumont et Montrichard (d’abord sous la tutelle de son oncle Lisois, il unifie les 3 seigneuries d’Amboise puis combat les comtes de Vendôme et les seigneurs de Châteaurenault, reconstruit le château d’Amboise (1115) et le pont sur la Loire ; donation à l’Abbaye de Pontlevoy avant sa croisade)
     [ ép. ~1103 Lisoye de Colombiers et/ou ? ]
     ép. ~1103 (avant 1107) Elisabeth de Jaligny (alias de Souvigny ou Sauvigny) dame de Jaligny (-sur-Besbre, Allier) et La Montagne + 12/10/1154 (demi-soeur du comte d’Anjou Foulques V ; fille de Foulques «Le Réchin» ou de Guillaume de Jaligny et d’Ermengarde de Bourbon ?)”.⁵

; Per Med Lands:
     "HUGUES [I] (-Jerusalem 24 Jul [1129/30], bur Jerusalem Mount Olives). The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Hugonem et duas filias Aanordim et Emendendim" as the children of "Supplicius de Calvomonte" & his wife Denise[527]. Seigneur de Chaumont-sur-Loire 1096. “Hugo filius Sulpicii” confirmed donations to Marmoutier made by “Gausfredus de Caluomonte...etiam pater suus Sulpicius et mater sua Dionisia” by charter dated to before 1100[528]. Seigneur d'Amboise. "Radulfo de Bulgeniaco, Hugone de Ambasia, Rainaldo, Gaufridi fratre" signed the charter dated to [1104/24] which records that "Guicherius Castri Rainaldi" deposited property at Marmoutier and that "Guicherii filius Gaufridus" requested return of the property, the dispute being litigated at the court of "dominæ suæ Adelæ Blesensis comitissæ" (which narrows the dating to before [1107] when her son Thibaut IV was invested as count)[529]. “Hugo filius Sulpicii de Caluomonte” relinquished claims to “domum apud Blesis” in favour of Marmoutier, with the consent of “Elysabeth uxor ipsius Hugonis...et Sulpitius filius eius”, in the presence of “...Hugo filius Ebrardi de Ambaziaco...”, by charter dated 1108[530]. "Hugo de Ambazia" waived his right of capture on certain conditions, with the consent of "Supplicio filio suo", by charter dated to [1105/28][531]. “Hugo...Ambaziaci castri dominus” relinquished claims to property of “hominis beati Martini Hilgodi” in favour of Marmoutier by charter dated 1114[532]. The Gesta Ambaziensium records that Hugues fought in the army of Foulques King of Jerusalem in Damascus but died "Jerusalem IX Kal Aug" and was buried "in Monte Oliveti prope ecclesiam"[533].
     "m ([1103]) ELISABETH de Jaligny Dame de Jaligny-en-Bourbonnais, daughter of GUILLAUME Seigneur de Jaligny & his wife Ermengarde de Bourbon (-12 Oct 1154, bur Pontlevoy). The Gesta Consulum Andegavensium records that "Gosfridum Martellum" arranged the marriage of "Elisabeth sororem suam ex matre sua et Guillelmo Jalinniaci ortam" and "Hugoni de Calvo Monte" and gave "Ambaziacum" as her dowry[534], although this contradicts the Gesta Ambaziensium which records that Amboise came into the family with the mother of Sulpice [I] (see above). “Hugo filius Sulpicii de Caluomonte” relinquished claims to “domum apud Blesis” in favour of Marmoutier, with the consent of “Elysabeth uxor ipsius Hugonis...et Sulpitius filius eius”, in the presence of “...Hugo filius Ebrardi de Ambaziaco...”, by charter dated 1108[535]. The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Elisabeth sororem suam [Uldini]" as the wife of "Hugonis…Supplicium primogenitum"[536]."
Med Lands cites:

     Hugues I (?) seigneur d'Amboise, de Chaumont-sur-Loire et de was born circa 1075.¹ He married Lisoye de Colombiers before 1103
; Racines et Histoire says possible 1st wife.³ Hugues I (?) seigneur d'Amboise, de Chaumont-sur-Loire et de married Elisabeth/Isabelle (?) Dame de Jaligny-en-Bourbonnais, daughter of Guillaume de Jaligny seigneur de Souvigny-Jaligny and Ermengarde de Bourbon, in 1103.^{2,6,4,7,8,1,5}

Hugues I (?) seigneur d'Amboise, de Chaumont-sur-Loire et de died on 24 July 1129 at Jerusalem, Yerushalayim (Jerusalem District), Israel (now).^1,4,5
      ; Per Med Lands:
     "ELISABETH de Jaligny (-12 Oct 1154, bur Pontlevoy). The Gesta Consulum Andegavensium records that "Gosfridum Martellum" arranged the marriage of "Elisabeth sororem suam ex matre sua et Guillelmo Jalinniaci ortam" and "Hugoni de Calvo Monte" and gave "Ambaziacum" as her dowry[323], although this contradicts the Gesta Ambaziensium which records that Amboise came into the family with the mother of Sulpice [I]. “Hugo filius Sulpicii de Caluomonte” relinquished claims to “domum apud Blesis” in favour of Marmoutier, with the consent of “Elysabeth uxor ipsius Hugonis...et Sulpitius filius eius”, in the presence of “...Hugo filius Ebrardi de Ambaziaco...”, by charter dated 1108[324]. The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Elisabeth sororem suam [Uldini]" as the wife of "Hugonis…Supplicium primogenitum"[325].
     "m ([1103]) HUGUES [I] de Chaumont, son of SULPICE [I] Seigneur d'Amboise & his wife Denise [de Fougères] (-Jerusalem 24 Jul [1129/30], bur Jerusalem Mount Olives)."
Med Lands cites: GAV-26.

; Per Genealogics:
     “Hugues was the son of Sulpice I d'Amboise, seigneur de Chaumont. He was the most powerful lord of Touraine after the count of Anjou.
     “After years of war, in order to reach a truce with Foulques IV 'Nerra', comte d'Anjou, Hugues' father gave him as a hostage to the count. Hugues thus remained much of his childhood at the court of Anjou. His uncle Lisois de Verneuil, after the death of his father, managed to secure his release by threatening to defect from the count at a time when he was vulnerable to attacks by the count of Poitou and Geoffrey IV, sire de Preuilly. Having resumed the ownership of his properties, Hugues had himself dubbed a knight and resumed the fight against the count of Anjou.
     “In 1096 Hugues was one of the first lords of Touraine to answer the call to Crusade of Pope Urban II. Along with several other lords he left the abbey of Marmoutier for the Holy Land on the First Crusade in the army of Godefroy de Bouillon, duke of Lower-Lorraine. Before leaving he entrusted the custody of the castle of Amboise to his brother-in-law Robert des Roches, seigneur de Roche-Corbon. However, wary of Foulques IV who sought to take control of the castles of Roche-Corbon and Amboise, in 1095 Hugues built in a corner of the castle of Roche-Corbon, on the highest rock, a square tower forming a kind of lighthouse, whose lights could be easily seen from the fortress of Amboise. Using agreed signals, each garrison could warn the other of an attack. This tower, the only ruin of the castle still in existence, is still known as the 'Lantern of Rochecorbon'. Hugues participated in the siege of Nicaea, the siege of Antioch in June 1098, the fall of Ma'arat al-Nu'man on 11 December 1098, and the conquest of Jerusalem on 15 July 1099, and the siege of Ascalon in August 1099.
     “He regained his domains at Christmas 1099. On his return the war resumed with Foulques IV. Foulques formed alliances with Aubri, seigneur de Montresor et Montrichard and with Josselin and Hugues de Sainte-Maure de Touraine. For his part Hugues made a covenant with his brother-in-law the lord of Lignières. Hugues won this war, though in 1109 it cost the deaths of the two brothers de Sainte Maure, and Foulques IV himself.
     “His successor Foulques V 'the Young' of Anjou preferred to deal with Hugues by ceding to him all his possessions in the vicinity of Amboise. This did not subsequently inhibit Hugues from attacking his other aggressor Aubri, seigneur de Montresor et Montrichard. At the end of 1109 he defeated Aubri on the banks of the Indre, and he captured the fortress of Montrichard and annexed his dominions.
     “In 1103 Hugues married Elisabeth de Jaligny, dame de Jaligny-en-Bourbonnais, daughter of Guillaume, sire de Jaligny, and Ermengarde de Bourbon, who was the stepmother of Foulques V 'the Young'. They had four sons and a daughter; only their son Sulpice II would have progeny.
     “Between 1105 and 1120 Hugues funded numerous construction works throughout Touraine, and in particular castles, abbeys, bridges, churches and monasteries. He almost entirely rebuilt the castle of Amboise, which became one of the main strongholds of Touraine. In 1115 he also built, opposite the castle of Amboise, the second stone bridge over the Loire after that of Tours. This bridge replaced a pontoon bridge.
     “In 1120 Hugues again went on Crusade, to accompany Foulques V 'the Young', who was going to marry the daughter of the king of Jerusalem. He participated in several expeditions, including one against Damascus, and he died in Jerusalem on 24 July 1129. His body was buried on the Mount of Olives near Jerusalem.
     “Hugues' widow Elisabeth set out at the head of a small army to recover the legacy of her father that neighbouring lords had stolen. The fight was protracted but she finally triumphed and regained her properties. In 1128 she had also taken up arms to defend some of her children who were attacked.
     “In 1153, although very old, she supported her son Sulpice II in his war against Thibaut V, comte de Blois. She concluded a peace treaty with Thibaut in 1154, and died on 12 December that year.
     “After her death her son Oudin inherited the lordship of Jaligny.”.¹

Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIII 1.¹

; Per Racines et Histoire (Amboise): “Hugues 1er (ou II) d’Amboise + 24/06 ou 07?/1129/30 (Jérusalem ; croisé : 1096 & ~1128) seul seigneur d’Amboise, Jaligny, Chaumont et Montrichard (d’abord sous la tutelle de son oncle Lisois, il unifie les 3 seigneuries d’Amboise puis combat les comtes de Vendôme et les seigneurs de Châteaurenault, reconstruit le château d’Amboise (1115) et le pont sur la Loire ; donation à l’Abbaye de Pontlevoy avant sa croisade)
     [ ép. ~1103 Lisoye de Colombiers et/ou ? ]
     ép. ~1103 (avant 1107) Elisabeth de Jaligny (alias de Souvigny ou Sauvigny) dame de Jaligny (-sur-Besbre, Allier) et La Montagne + 12/10/1154 (demi-soeur du comte d’Anjou Foulques V ; fille de Foulques «Le Réchin» ou de Guillaume de Jaligny et d’Ermengarde de Bourbon ?)”.⁴

; Per Med Lands:
     "HUGUES [I] (-Jerusalem 24 Jul [1129/30], bur Jerusalem Mount Olives). The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Hugonem et duas filias Aanordim et Emendendim" as the children of "Supplicius de Calvomonte" & his wife Denise[527]. Seigneur de Chaumont-sur-Loire 1096. “Hugo filius Sulpicii” confirmed donations to Marmoutier made by “Gausfredus de Caluomonte...etiam pater suus Sulpicius et mater sua Dionisia” by charter dated to before 1100[528]. Seigneur d'Amboise. "Radulfo de Bulgeniaco, Hugone de Ambasia, Rainaldo, Gaufridi fratre" signed the charter dated to [1104/24] which records that "Guicherius Castri Rainaldi" deposited property at Marmoutier and that "Guicherii filius Gaufridus" requested return of the property, the dispute being litigated at the court of "dominæ suæ Adelæ Blesensis comitissæ" (which narrows the dating to before [1107] when her son Thibaut IV was invested as count)[529]. “Hugo filius Sulpicii de Caluomonte” relinquished claims to “domum apud Blesis” in favour of Marmoutier, with the consent of “Elysabeth uxor ipsius Hugonis...et Sulpitius filius eius”, in the presence of “...Hugo filius Ebrardi de Ambaziaco...”, by charter dated 1108[530]. "Hugo de Ambazia" waived his right of capture on certain conditions, with the consent of "Supplicio filio suo", by charter dated to [1105/28][531]. “Hugo...Ambaziaci castri dominus” relinquished claims to property of “hominis beati Martini Hilgodi” in favour of Marmoutier by charter dated 1114[532]. The Gesta Ambaziensium records that Hugues fought in the army of Foulques King of Jerusalem in Damascus but died "Jerusalem IX Kal Aug" and was buried "in Monte Oliveti prope ecclesiam"[533].
     "m ([1103]) ELISABETH de Jaligny Dame de Jaligny-en-Bourbonnais, daughter of GUILLAUME Seigneur de Jaligny & his wife Ermengarde de Bourbon (-12 Oct 1154, bur Pontlevoy). The Gesta Consulum Andegavensium records that "Gosfridum Martellum" arranged the marriage of "Elisabeth sororem suam ex matre sua et Guillelmo Jalinniaci ortam" and "Hugoni de Calvo Monte" and gave "Ambaziacum" as her dowry[534], although this contradicts the Gesta Ambaziensium which records that Amboise came into the family with the mother of Sulpice [I] (see above). “Hugo filius Sulpicii de Caluomonte” relinquished claims to “domum apud Blesis” in favour of Marmoutier, with the consent of “Elysabeth uxor ipsius Hugonis...et Sulpitius filius eius”, in the presence of “...Hugo filius Ebrardi de Ambaziaco...”, by charter dated 1108[535]. The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Elisabeth sororem suam [Uldini]" as the wife of "Hugonis…Supplicium primogenitum"[536]."
Med Lands cites:

     Sulpice II «Le Hutin» d'Amboise Seigneur d'Amboise was born before 1106; Racine et Histoire (Amboise and Donzy) say b. 1105/07; Genealogics says b. ca 1105; Med Lands says b. bef 1106.^10,11,8,9 He married Agnès de Donzy, daughter of Hervé II de Donzy seigneur de Donzy et Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, comte de Châlons and Mahaut Le Blanc de La Ferté-Milon, circa 1129.^{8,10,11,9,12,13}

Sulpice II «Le Hutin» d'Amboise Seigneur d'Amboise died on 24 August 1153 at Château de Châteaudun, France (now).^11,10,8,9
      ; This is the same person as ”Sulpice II d'Amboise” at Wikipédia (FR).⁴

; Per Genealogics:
     “Sulpice, known as 'le Hutin' (the headstrong), was born about 1105, the eldest son of Hugues I d'Amboise, seigneur de Chaumont-sur-Loire, sire d'Amboise, and Elisabeth de Jaligny, dame de Jaligny-en-Bourbonnais. In 1129 he married Agnès de Donzy, daughter of Hervé II de Donzy and a daughter of Hugues le Blanc de La Ferté. They had two sons and two daughters, of whom Hugues II and Denise would have progeny.
     “In 1135, when Sulpice refused to submit to the new Count of Anjou, Geoffrey V 'the Fair', Geoffrey attacked Amboise. Sulpice, supported by the lords of Chartres, Blois, Orléans and Berry, inflicted a bloody defeat on him. In the following years many wars broke out in Anjou between the vassal and his overlord, but also between Sulpice and his neighbours. During one battle, Sulpice managed to capture Geoffroy II Grisegonelle, comte de Vendôme, having routed his army of more than 7000 men. Then at Cagny, two leagues from Amboise, he defeated the army of Seneschal Bouchard Saint-Amand-de Vendôme, seigneur de Châteaurenaud, whom he captured with seven other knights. He locked them all in his fortress of Amboise.
     “In 1136 he again defeated the army of the count of Vendôme near Villechauve, and he captured Jean de Preuilly, son and heir of Geoffroy II Grisegonelle, comte de Vendôme, whom he imprisoned in his castle of Chaumont-sur-Loire.
     “In 1153 he was captured by Thibaut IV, comte de Blois, who incarcerated him in his castle-keep of Chateaudun. Here Sulpice was tortured every day to attempt to force him to relinquish his castle of Chaumont.
     “Sulpice died of these tortures on 24 August 1153, without having surrendered Chaumont. His two sons Hervé and Hugues II, who had been captured along with him, were only released on the intervention of their cousin Henry Plantagenet, future king of England.”.⁸

Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIII 1.⁸

; Per Med Lands:
     "SULPICE [II] (before 1106-Château de Châteaudun 24 Aug 1153). The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Supplicium, Hugonem et Oldinum atque filam Dionisiam" as the children of "Hugonis…Supplicium primogenitum" & his wife[537]. "Hugo de Ambazia" waived his right of capture on certain conditions, with the consent of "Supplicio filio suo", by charter dated to [1105/28][538]. “Hugo filius Sulpicii de Caluomonte” relinquished claims to “domum apud Blesis” in favour of Marmoutier, with the consent of “Elysabeth uxor ipsius Hugonis...et Sulpitius filius eius”, in the presence of “...Hugo filius Ebrardi de Ambaziaco...”, by charter dated 1108[539]. Seigneur d'Amboise. He died in prison. The necrology of Pontlevoy records the death "IX Kal Sep" of "Sulpicius de Ambaziaco"[540].
     "m AGNES de Donzy, daughter of HERVE [II] Seigneur de Donzy & his wife --- de la Ferté (-2 Mar after 1155). The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Agnete" as the wife of Sulpice [II] but does not give her origin[541]. A history of Amboise written at Marmoutier records that “Hugo dominus Ambaziæ” arranged the marriage of “Supplicio filio suo” and “Agnetem filiam Hervei de Danzeio”[542]. The necrology of Pontlevoy records the death "VI Non Mar" of "Agnes domina Ambazie"[543]."
Med Lands cites:

; Per Racines et Histoire (Amboise): “Sulpice II d’Amboise dit «Le Hutin» ° 1105/07 + 21 ou 24?/08/1153 (prisonnier, Châteaudun, supplicié) seigneur d’Amboise, Chaumont et Jaligny (vainct en 1132 Geoffroi III, comte de Vendôme et détruit Châteaurenault mais est vaincu par Thibaut IV de Blois, qui rase Chaumont)
     ép.~1129 Agnès de Donzy + 02/03/~1155 (fille d’Hervé II, seigneur de Saint-Aignan, et de Mahaut de La Ferté-Milon)”


Per Racines et Histoire (Donzy): “? Agnès de Donzy ° ~1110 + 02 ou 09/03/~1155
     ép.~1129 Sulpice II «Le Hutin», seigneur d’Amboise ° 1105/07 + 21/08/1153 (fille d’Hugues d’Amboise et d’Elisabeth de Souvigny) postérité Amboise ”.^10,11

; Per Med Lands:
     "AGNES de Donzy . The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Agnete" as the wife of Sulpice [II] but does not give her origin[357]. A history of Amboise written at Marmoutier records that “Hugo dominus Ambaziæ” arranged the marriage of “Supplicio filio suo” and “Agnetem filiam Hervei de Danzeio”[358]. The necrology of Pontlevoy records the death "VI Non Mar" of "Agnes domina Ambazie"[359].
     "m SULPICE [II] Seigneur d'Amboise, son of HUGUES [I] Seigneur d'Amboise & his wife Elisabeth de Jaligny (before 1106-Château de Châteaudun 24 Aug 1153)."
Med Lands cites: GAV-26.

     Agnès de Donzy was born circa 1110.² She married Sulpice II «Le Hutin» d'Amboise Seigneur d'Amboise, son of Hugues I (?) seigneur d'Amboise, de Chaumont-sur-Loire et de and Elisabeth/Isabelle (?) Dame de Jaligny-en-Bourbonnais, circa 1129.^7,5,4,8,3,6

Agnès de Donzy died after 2 March 1155.^3,4,5
      ; Per Racines et Histoire (Amboise): “Sulpice II d’Amboise dit «Le Hutin» ° 1105/07 + 21 ou 24?/08/1153 (prisonnier, Châteaudun, supplicié) seigneur d’Amboise, Chaumont et Jaligny (vainct en 1132 Geoffroi III, comte de Vendôme et détruit Châteaurenault mais est vaincu par Thibaut IV de Blois, qui rase Chaumont)
     ép.~1129 Agnès de Donzy + 02/03/~1155 (fille d’Hervé II, seigneur de Saint-Aignan, et de Mahaut de La Ferté-Milon)”


Per Racines et Histoire (Donzy): “? Agnès de Donzy ° ~1110 + 02 ou 09/03/~1155
     ép.~1129 Sulpice II «Le Hutin», seigneur d’Amboise ° 1105/07 + 21/08/1153 (fille d’Hugues d’Amboise et d’Elisabeth de Souvigny) postérité Amboise ”.^5,4

; Per Med Lands:
     "SULPICE [II] (before 1106-Château de Châteaudun 24 Aug 1153). The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Supplicium, Hugonem et Oldinum atque filam Dionisiam" as the children of "Hugonis…Supplicium primogenitum" & his wife[537]. "Hugo de Ambazia" waived his right of capture on certain conditions, with the consent of "Supplicio filio suo", by charter dated to [1105/28][538]. “Hugo filius Sulpicii de Caluomonte” relinquished claims to “domum apud Blesis” in favour of Marmoutier, with the consent of “Elysabeth uxor ipsius Hugonis...et Sulpitius filius eius”, in the presence of “...Hugo filius Ebrardi de Ambaziaco...”, by charter dated 1108[539]. Seigneur d'Amboise. He died in prison. The necrology of Pontlevoy records the death "IX Kal Sep" of "Sulpicius de Ambaziaco"[540].
     "m AGNES de Donzy, daughter of HERVE [II] Seigneur de Donzy & his wife --- de la Ferté (-2 Mar after 1155). The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Agnete" as the wife of Sulpice [II] but does not give her origin[541]. A history of Amboise written at Marmoutier records that “Hugo dominus Ambaziæ” arranged the marriage of “Supplicio filio suo” and “Agnetem filiam Hervei de Danzeio”[542]. The necrology of Pontlevoy records the death "VI Non Mar" of "Agnes domina Ambazie"[543]."
Med Lands cites:

Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIII 1.³

; Per Med Lands:
     "AGNES de Donzy . The Gesta Ambaziensium names "Agnete" as the wife of Sulpice [II] but does not give her origin[357]. A history of Amboise written at Marmoutier records that “Hugo dominus Ambaziæ” arranged the marriage of “Supplicio filio suo” and “Agnetem filiam Hervei de Danzeio”[358]. The necrology of Pontlevoy records the death "VI Non Mar" of "Agnes domina Ambazie"[359].
     "m SULPICE [II] Seigneur d'Amboise, son of HUGUES [I] Seigneur d'Amboise & his wife Elisabeth de Jaligny (before 1106-Château de Châteaudun 24 Aug 1153)."
Med Lands cites: GAV-26.

     Hugues III d'Amboise Sire d'Amboise, Seigneur de Jaligny married Mathilde (?) de Vendôme, daughter of Jean I (?) comte de Vendôme and Richilde de Lavardin dame de Lavardin.⁷
Hugues III d'Amboise Sire d'Amboise, Seigneur de Jaligny was born circa 1135.²
Hugues III d'Amboise Sire d'Amboise, Seigneur de Jaligny died between 1190 and 1194.^1,2
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIII 1.¹ Hugues III d'Amboise Sire d'Amboise, Seigneur de Jaligny was also known as Hugues Sire d'Amboise, Seigneur de Jaligny.¹

     Mathilde (?) de Vendôme married Hugues III d'Amboise Sire d'Amboise, Seigneur de Jaligny, son of Sulpice II «Le Hutin» d'Amboise Seigneur d'Amboise and Agnès de Donzy.³
Mathilde (?) de Vendôme was born in 1139.²
Mathilde (?) de Vendôme died on 9 February 1199.^3,2
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIII 1.³ Mathilde (?) de Vendôme was also known as Mahaut (?) de Vendome.^3,2

     Denise d'Amboise married Ebbes II de Deols Seigneur de Châteauroux et de Chateauroux.^7,2
Denise d'Amboise was born circa 1135.²
Denise d'Amboise died before 20 May 1160.^1,2
     Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIV 68.¹

     Ebbes II de Deols Seigneur de Châteauroux et de Chateauroux married Denise d'Amboise, daughter of Sulpice II «Le Hutin» d'Amboise Seigneur d'Amboise and Agnès de Donzy.^1,2

Ebbes II de Deols Seigneur de Châteauroux et de Chateauroux died circa 1160.^1,2
     Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIV 68.¹

     Agnes (?) married Eudes de Deols Seigneur de Châteaumeillant, son of Ebbes II de Deols Seigneur de Châteauroux et de Chateauroux and Denise d'Amboise, after 1192
;
His 2nd wife. His 1st wife d in 1192.^1,2
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIV 68.¹ Agnes (?) was living in 1226.¹

     Raoul VII de Deols Prince de Déols, Sire de Châteauroux married Agnes de Charenton Dame de Meillent
; his 1st wife.^2,1 Raoul VII de Deols Prince de Déols, Sire de Châteauroux married Adeline de Sully, daughter of Eudes/Archambaud I de Sully Sire de Sully and Mathilde/Mahaut de Beaugency,
; his 2nd wife.³
Raoul VII de Deols Prince de Déols, Sire de Châteauroux died on 27 November 1176 at Ravenna, Provincia di Ravenna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy (now).¹
     Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIV 68.¹

     Agnes de Charenton Dame de Meillent married Raoul VII de Deols Prince de Déols, Sire de Châteauroux, son of Ebbes II de Deols Seigneur de Châteauroux et de Chateauroux and Denise d'Amboise,
; his 1st wife.^1,2
     Reference: Genealogics cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: XIV 68.¹

     Adeline de Sully married Raoul VII de Deols Prince de Déols, Sire de Châteauroux, son of Ebbes II de Deols Seigneur de Châteauroux et de Chateauroux and Denise d'Amboise,
; his 2nd wife.¹
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III/1 110.¹

     Hedwig (?) of Hungary married Eberhard IV (?) Vogt of Kloster Einsiedeln, son of Manegold (?).^6,2

      ; Per Med Lands: "HEDVIG . According to the early 12th century Vita Eberhardi[335], the mother of Eberhard Graf von Nellenburg (son of Eberhard IV Graf im Zürichgau) was a daughter of István I King of Hungary, although it is somewhat surprising that such a prominent figure as King István, in far off Hungary, would have married his daughter to an obscure Swiss count. The Annales Scafhusenses record the marriage in 1009 of "Ebbo comes de Nellenburc" and "consobrinam Heinrici regis Hedewigam…de curie regis"[336]. If "consobrinam" is here used in its precise sense, Hedwig would have been the daughter of one of the sisters of Gisela, daughter of Conrad I King of Upper Burgundy. Hedvig founded Kloster Pfaffenschwabenheim as a widow[337]. If she was the daughter of King István, there is a remote possibility that she was the same daughter who supposedly married Edmund ætheling (see below), although if this is correct she would have been much older than her second husband. This supposed Hungarian origin appears unlikely, given Hedwig’s property holding in Rheingau mentioned in the following document: “Comes Eberhardus cum domina Hadewiga matre sua” founded Kloster Pfaffen-Schwabenheim bei Kreuznach with his mother’s property “im Rheingau” by charter dated 1034[338]. m (1009) EBERHARD [IV] Graf im Zürichgau, son of [MANGOLD [I] Graf im Zürichgau & his wife ---] (-[1030/34]).]"
Med Lands cites:

Reference: Genealogics cites: Burke's Guide to the Royal Family London, 1973 , Reference: 190.¹

     Mathilde (?) von Sulzbach married Engelbert III (?) Graf von Sponheim, Markgraf von Istrien and Tuscany, son of Engelbert II (?) Graf von Sponheim, Graf von Kärnten, Markgraf von Istrien and Uta (?) von Passau.^7,2

Mathilde (?) von Sulzbach died on 3 November 1165.^1,2,3
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III/1 25.¹

     Engelbert III (?) Graf von Sponheim, Markgraf von Istrien and Tuscany married Mathilde (?) von Sulzbach, daughter of Berengar I von Sulzbach Graf von Sulzbach, Graf von Bamberg and Adelheid von Diessen.^1,2

Engelbert III (?) Graf von Sponheim, Markgraf von Istrien and Tuscany died on 6 October 1173.^1,2
      ; Leo van de Pas cites: Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag Marburg., Detlev Schwennicke, Editor, Reference: III/1 25.¹

; Gf Engelbert III von Sponheim, Margrave of Istria and Tuscany, +6.10.1173; m.Mathilde von Sulzbach (+3.11.1165.)²

     Henryk I-III (?) von Schlesien, Duke Glogowski was born between 1251 and 1260.^1,2,6 He married Matilde (?) Herzogin von Brunswick-Lüneburg, daughter of Albrecht I "the Great/Longus" (?) Duke of Braunschweig-Lüneburg and Alessina del Monferrato, before April 1290
; Leo van de Pas says m. Apr 1290; Piast 7 page says m. Mar 1290; Med Lands says m. May 1291.^1,2,7,6,8
Henryk I-III (?) von Schlesien, Duke Glogowski died on 9 December 1309; Leo van de Pas says d. 9 Dec 1309; Piast 7 page says d. 11.12.1309.^1,2,7,6
Henryk I-III (?) von Schlesien, Duke Glogowski was buried after 9 December 1309 at Kloster Lüben .⁶
      ; Per Genealogy.EU: "Duke Henryk I of Glogau (1274-1310) and Sagan (1304-10), Duke of Great Poland (1306-10), *1251/60, +11.12.1310; m.III.1290 Mechtild (*1276 +1318) dau.of Duke Albrecht of Brunswick-Lüneburg."²

; Per Wikipedia:
     "Henry III (I) of G?ogów (Polish: Henryk; 1251/60 – 3 December 1309) was a duke of Glogów from 1274 to his death and also duke of parts of Greater Poland during 1306–1309.
     "He was one of the sons (probably the second)[1] of Konrad I, Duke of G?ogów, by his first wife Salome, daughter of Duke W?adys?aw of Greater Poland.
Life
Early years
     "Little is known about his first years of life. In 1267 Henry III participated in the canonization of his great-grandmother Hedwig of Andechs. At the time of his father's death in 1274 he and his brothers are still minors; for this, his step-mother Sophie of Landsberg (widow of his father) and the Chancellor Miko?aj took their guardianship. Shortly after, they sold the towns of Boles?awiec and Nowogrodziec nad Kwis? to the Archbishop of Magdeburg.
Beginning of cooperation with Henry IV Probus
     "The first participation of Henry III in the political arena was in 1277, when together with Przemys? II of Greater Poland he took part in an armed expedition against his uncle Boles?aw II the Bald. The trip was provoked by the attitude of the Duke of Legnica, who, in order to obtain territorial concessions, kidnapped the young Henry IV and imprisoned him in his castle of Legnica. Henry III and the Bohemian King Ottokar II formed a coalition of Silesian Princes to help the prisoner Duke. However, they were defeated in the Battle of Stolec on 24 April 1277. At the head of the Legnica troops came the son and heir of Boles?aw II, Henry V the Fat. It was probably here that the conflicts between him and Henry V began, which later caused great suffering to the Duke of Legnica.
Fall of King Ottokar II and Division of the Duchy of G?ogów
     "One year later Henry III participated in the great Battle on the Marchfeld (26 August 1278), where King Ottokar II was defeated and killed. In the same year Henry III was forced to make a division of his lands between his brothers: he retained the main cities of the Duchy —G?ogów, Bytom Odrza?ski and Ko?uchów—; Konrad II the Hunchback obtained ?cinawa and Przemko received ?aga? and Nowogród Bobrza?ski; soon after Konrad II went to study in Bologna, and Henry IV Probus took his lands in his name; with this, the ruler of Wroclaw showed his intentions to stretch his sovereignty over all the other G?ogów princes and Silesian rulers.
Influence of Henry IV Probus over Silesia
     "In 1281 Henry III, together with Henry V the Fat and Przemys? II of Greater Poland were invited by Henry IV Probus to a meeting in S?dowel. The Duke of Wroc?aw broke the law of hospitality and captured the three Dukes. Henry IV released them only after they recognized his overlordship.[2] Although the agreement was concluded under duress, it has stood the test of time and in the next few years, we see Henry III, together with his brother Przemko among the close associates of the Duke of Wroclaw in his great political ecclesiastical conflict Thomas II, bishop of Wroclaw.[3] His loyalty to Henry IV Probus caused that the ruler of G?ogów would be excommunicated twice.[4] It was only after the death of Henry IV that Henry III's relations with the clergy returned to normality.
Henry IV's death and execution of his will
     "The close cooperation between Henry III and Henryk IV Probus was evident when in Krosno Odrza?skie on 11 January 1288 Henry III was knighted by the Duke of Wroc?aw.[5] The major proof of the subjugation of the Duke of Glogów was after the death of his brother Przemko on 26 February 1289: his Duchy of ?cinawa was annexed by Henry IV without any protest of Henry III. However, one year later, on 23 June 1290, Henry IV Probus died suddenly, probably poisoned,[6] an event which seriously affected the further career of the Duke of Glogów. In his will, the dying Duke of Wroc?aw left Henry III as his main heir. However, the Wroc?aw knights and burghers had other plans and one month later (mid-July 1290) they forced Henry III to escape. As their new ruler, the rebels invited Duke Henry V the Fat of Legnica to take the government. The reasons for the Wroc?aw revolt were unknown, but maybe the harsh rule of Henry III was a decisive factor. In any event, Henry III refused to accept this and immediately declared war on Henry V.
War against Henry V the Fat
     "Shortly after taking control over Wroc?aw, Henry V the Fat forced the Duke of G?ogów to renounce all his pretensions over the disputed territories of Chojnów, Boleslawiec, Go?ciszów, Nowogrodziec, ?cinawa, Wi?sko, Syców, Uraz, Trzebnica, Milicz and S?dowel. However, Henry III managed to recover ?cinawa soon after.
     "Both sides quickly began to find allies who would support them in the war. Henry III made a treaty with the House of Wettin, strengthening this alliance by marrying the daughter of Duke Albert I of Brunswick-Lüneburg, Matilda (March 1291). Further allies were Otto IV, Margrave of Brandenburg-Stendal and Przemys? II of Greater Poland. With the latter Henry III entered into an arrangement under which if Przemys? II died without male issue, the Duke of G?ogów would inherit his lands. In the meanwhile, Henry V the Fat obtained the support of King Wenceslaus II of Bohemia.
     "Henry V's rule over Wroc?aw was extremely conservative and clashed with some political opponents among the nobility. One of them, Pakos?aw Zdzieszyca, was sentenced to death accused of murder. The revenge of Pakos?aw's son Lutka, was impressive: on 11 November 1293 he captured Henry V and gave him to Henry III, who put him in an iron cage for almost six months. Henry V only obtained his freedom after surrendering the towns of Namys?ów, Bierutów, Ole?nica, Kluczbork, Byczyna, Wo?czyn, Olesno, Chojnów and Boles?awiec (almost 1/3 of Henry IV's lands) with their respectives fortresses to Henry III, paying of a ransom of 30,000 pieces of silver and promising to assist the Duke of G?ogów for the next five years in all his wars.
Death of Przemys? II and the succession over Greater Poland
     "On 8 February 1296 the Duke of Greater Poland and since 1295 King of Poland Przemys? II was murdered. The Greater Poland-G?ogów alliance collapsed around 1293, when Przemys? II attacked Duke W?adys?aw I the Elbow-high of Kuyavia. Because of this, the Greater Poland nobility chose W?adys?aw I to succeed Przemys? II in Pozna?, despite the claims of Henry III, who considered that the treaty signed with Przemys? II in 1290 was still valid and in consequence, he was his sole heir (Przemys? II married three times but only left one daughter from his second marriage, Richeza).
     "Henry III and W?adys?aw I quickly concluded a settlement on 10 March 1296 in Krzywin, under which the Duke of G?ogów obtained all the lands from the south of the Obra River. At the same time W?adys?aw I designated Henry III's eldest son, Henry IV the Faithful as his heir over Pozna?, and, in case of his death without male issue, over all Greater Poland.
War against Bolko I the Strict
     "The reason Henry III gave large concessions to W?adys?aw I in the treaty of 1296 was that he was already defeated by Bolko I the Strict, Duke of Jawor. When Henry III stayed in Krzywin, Bolko I took Chojnów and Boleslawiec. Through the mediation of King Wenceslaus II of Bohemia, a settlement was made on Zwanowice in March 1297; the Duke of G?ogów managed to make a truce with the Duke of Jawor, but was forced to renounce the above-mentioned districts.
Relations with King Wenceslaus II of Bohemia
     "At the end of the 1290s Henry III could improve his relations with the King Wenceslaus II of Bohemia (for example, he was present in Prague on Wenceslaus II's coronation in 1297), but also his relations with W?adys?aw I the Elbow-high deteriorated, and at the end a war broke out. In June 1298, in Ko?cian (and despite the opposition of the Greater Poland nobility with the Bishop of Poznan Andrzej Zaremba at their head) Henry III and W?adys?aw I signed a new treaty, under which in return for confirmation of the church and the inclusion in a future "Kingdom" of the functions of Chancellor, Henry III promised assistance to W?adys?aw I in order to complete the total subjection of Greater Poland, Gda?sk Pomerania and in this way he could obtain the Royal crown. The conflict between the Piast Dukes was used by King Wenceslaus II. In the village of Kl?ka on 23 August 1299 an agreement was concluded under which Henry III was forced to abandon his pretentions over all Greater Poland for good.
Disputes with Bishop Jan Romka and Konrad II the Hunchback
     "Henry III accepted immediately the intervention of the Bohemian King, because he was busy in his own duchy with his disputes with the Bishop of Wroclaw Jan Romka. The conflict was caused by the Duchy of ?aga?, which, previously belonging to his younger brother Konrad II the Hunchback, was taken by Henry III in March 1299 when Konrad II was chosen as Patriarch of Aquileia. But when Konrad II returned to ?aga?, Henryk III didn't want to return the Duchy to him, which was under his rule during his absence. Even after the intervention of the vassals and the Church, Henry III refused to give Konrad II his Duchy. Bishop Jan Romka excommunicated him and supported the requests of Konrad II. The fight with the church was resolved only on 24 April 1300 confirming the victory of the Bishop and the restitution of ?aga? to Konrad II.
Increase of Henry III's power. Adoption of the title "Heir of the Kingdom of Poland"
     "The Duke of Glogów didn't have any intention of resigning his pretentions over the Greater Poland inheritance, as was evidenced in 1301, when he adopted the title: "Heir of the Polish Kingdom, Duke of Silesia, G?ogów and Pozna?" (Polish: "dziedzic Królestwa Polskiego, ksi??? ?l?ska, pan G?ogowa i Poznania"). This soon caused an armed conflict with the King of Bohemia and now of Poland Wenceslaus II. The danger around Henry III increased especially after 1301, when the Bohemian King took over the custody of the children of Henry V the Fat, this after the death on 9 November 1301 of their uncle Bolko I the Strict. Despite the delicate situation the war never occurred, because Wenceslaus II was busy in his attempts to obtain the Hungarian crown for his son. The death of Wenceslaus II in 1305 and the murder of his son and successor Wenceslaus III the following year favored the opportunities of Henry III over his pretentions in Greater Poland. The death of his brother Konrad II on 11 October 1304 further facilitated Henry III's situation, because he could annex his Duchy of ?aga? without inconvenience and also reunified the whole Duchy of G?ogów under his rule.
Claims over Greater Poland. Acquisition of parts from Przemys? II's inheritance
     "In the spring of 1306 Henry III was able to advance over the Greater Poland-Kuyavia borderline (Konin) and Gda?sk Pomerania, forcing W?adys?aw I the Elbow-high to retreat. Kalisz resisted the pretentions of the Duke of G?ogów, but he was able to master it in 1307 from his current ruler, Duke Boles?aw III the Generous (the eldest son of Henry V the Fat), who also had a claim over the whole succession of Wenceslaus (as the husband of her youngest daughter Margareta); eventually, all Greater Poland was taken by the Duke of G?ogów. Soon Henry III and the new King of Bohemia Henry of Carinthia formed an alliance against Boles?aw III's ambitious plans.
Internal politics
     "In the internal politics, Henry III could maintain his Duchy far away from the wars where he was constantly involved, and in consequence, the economy improved and with this the prestige and wealth of G?ogów increased. Henry III also introduced administrative and monetary reforms which affected not only the townspeople but also his own court and the nobility. Also, he founded more than a dozen urban centers (like Góra, W?sosz, Polkowice, Twardogóra, Sulechów, Zielona Góra, Lubin, Przem?t and Ko?cian).
     "In his relations with the Church, Henry III was a generous benefactor. During his rule several monasteries and parish churches were founded. The Duke of G?ogów also patron of many artists, which is reflected in the building of the tombstones of Henry IV Probus, Boles?aw I the Tall, his brothers and parents, in the G?ogów Kolegiata and Przemys? II in Poznan Cathedral.
Death and succession
     "Henry III died on 9 December 1309 and was buried in the Cistercian Church of Lubi??. His five sons: Henry IV, Konrad I, Jan, Boleslaw and Przemko, soon split between them the inheritance of his father and led to the decline of the Duchy. Moreover, this political fragmentation, visible especially in the Greater Poland region, scared the local nobility, who thought that maybe they risked losing their positions. In the end, W?adys?aw I the Elbow-high was able to conquer all Greater Poland in 1314.
Marriage and issue
     "In March 1291, Henry III married Matilda (born 1276 – died 26 April 1318), daughter of Albert I, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg. They had nine children:
1. Henry IV the Faithful (born c. 1292 – died 22 January 1342).
2. Konrad I (born c. 1294 – died 22 December 1366).
3. Boles?aw (born c. 1295 – died before 23 April 1321).
4. Agnes (born c. 1296 – died 25 December 1361), married firstly on 18 May 1309 to Otto III, Duke of Bavaria and secondly in 1329 to Alram, Count of Hals.
5. Salome (born c. 1297 – died before 9 December 1309).
6. Jan (born c. 1298 – died by 19 May 1365).
7. Katharina (born c. 1300 – died 5 December 1323/1326), married firstly bef. 24 March 1317 to John V, Margrave of Brandenburg-Salzwedel and secondly by 27 January 1319 to John III, Count of Holstein-Plön.
8. Przemko II (born c. 1305 – died 11 January 1331).
9. Hedwig (born c. 1308 – died before December 1309).
     "In his will, Henry III left Glogów to his wife as her dower, which she ruled until her own death.
Notes
1. Traditionally is believed that Henry III was the oldest of the brothers because he inherited from his father the center of the principality - G?ogów, and also appears as the oldest one in the Genealogy of St. Hedwig. However, one most reliable source, the Polish-Silesian Chronicle (pl: Kronika polsko-?l?ska), placed Konrad II as the oldest, and probably his physical deformity (hunchback) prevented him from taking power in the capital. K. Jasi?ski: Rodowód Piastów ?l?skich, vol. I, Wroc?aw 1973, p. 78; T. Jurek: Dziedzic królestwa polskiego ksi??? g?ogowski Henryk, Kraków 2010, p. 17, 21.
2. T. Jurek: Henryk Probus i Henryk g?ogowski, stosunki wzajemne w latach 1273-1290 "?l?ski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka", no.42 (1978), pp. 556-558.
3. M. Maciejowski: Orientacje polityczne biskupów metropolii gnie?nie?skiej 1283-1320, Kraków 2007, pp. 115-151; T. Silnicki: Dzieje i ustrój Ko?cio?a na ?l?sku do ko?ca w. XIV, in: Historia ?l?ska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, vol. II, no. 1, Kraków 1939, pp. 166-176.
4. T. Jurek: Konrad I g?ogowski. Studium z dziejów dzielnicowego ?l?ska, "Roczniki Historyczne", 54 (1988), pp. 137-138
5. This event is mentioned in the foundation of the collegiate church of St. Cross in Wroc?aw, and according to the reports of Jan D?ugosz, who, however, instead of Henry III of G?ogow mentions Henry V the Fat as the prince knighted that day; this is impossible, given the age of the later (more than 40 years old), and the hostility between him and Henry IV Probus. T. Jurek: Henryk Probus a..., pp. 556-557.
6. T. Jurek: Plany koronacyjne Henryka Probusa, in: ?l?sk w czasach Henryka IV Prawego, K. Wachowski (red.), Wroc?aw 2005, pp. 13-29.
References
** Tomasz Jurek, Dziedzic królestwa polskiego ksi??? g?ogowski Henryk, Kraków 2010.
** Tomasz Jurek, Henryk Probus i Henryk g?ogowski, stosunki wzajemne w latach 1273-1290, "?l?ski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka", 42 (1978), pp. 555–570.
** Maciej Maciejowski, Orientacje polityczne biskupów metropolii gnie?nie?skiej 1283-1320, Kraków 2007.
** Tadeusz Silnicki, Dzieje i ustrój Ko?cio?a na ?l?sku do ko?ca w. XIV, in: Historia ?l?ska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, vol. II, no. 1, Kraków 1939.
External links
** A listing of descendants of Konrad I, Duke of G?ogów: http://genealogy.euweb.cz/piast/piast7.html
** Genealogical database by Herbert Stoyan
** Cawley, Charles, SILESIA, Medieval Lands database, Foundation for Medieval Genealogy,[self-published source][better source needed]: http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SILESIA.htm#HeinrichIdied1310
** HENRYK III (I) G?OGOWSKI: http://www.poczet.com/glogowski.htm
** This article was translated from his original in Polish Wikipedia.⁹

; Per Genealogics:
     "Henryk I-III von Schlesien was born between 1251 and 1260, the eldest son of Konrad I, Duke Glogowsko-Bytomski and his first wife Salomea of Poland. At the time of his father's death he was still a minor.
     "Henryk's first participation in the political arena was in 1277 when, together with Przemyslaw II, duke of Poland (the future king of Poland) he took part in a campaign against his uncle Boleslaw II, duke of Legnica (Liegnitz). The campaign was provoked by Boleslaw's attitude; in order to obtain territorial concessions, he had kidnapped the young Henryk IV 'Probus', Herzog von Schlesien zu Breslau, the son of Boleslaw's brother Henryk III, and imprisoned him in his castle of Legnica. Henryk I-III and the Bohemian King Ottokar II formed a coalition of Silesian princes to force the release of Henryk IV. However, they were defeated in the Battle of Stolec on 24 April 1277. The Legnica troops were led by the son and heir of Boleslaw II, Henryk V 'the Fat'. This probably marked the beginning of the conflicts between Henryk I-III and Henryk V.
     "One year later Henryk I-III participated in the Great Battle of the Marchfeld (26 August 1278), where King Ottokar II of Bohemia was defeated and killed. In the same year Henryk was forced to divide his lands with his brothers. He retained the main cities of the duchy - Glogów, Bytom Odrzanski and Kozuchów; Konrad II 'the Hunchback' received Scinawa (Steinau), and Przemko (Primko) received Zagan (Sagan) and Nowogród Bobrzanski.
     "In 1281 Henryk I-III, together with Henryk V 'the Fat' and Przemyslaw II, duke of Poland, were invited by Henryk IV 'Probus', Herzog von Schlesien zu Breslau, to a meeting in Sadowel. Henryk 'Probus' broke the law of hospitality and captured the three dukes, releasing them only after they recognised his overlordship. Although their agreement was concluded under duress, it stood the test of time and in the next few years Henryk I-III and his brother Przemko were among the close associates of Henryk 'Probus'. Henryk I-III supported Henryk IV in his great conflict with Thomas II, bishop of Wroclaw.
     "The close cooperation between Henryk I-III and Henryk IV 'Probus' was evident when, in Krosno Odrzanskie on 11 January 1288, Henryk was knighted by Henryk 'Probus'. A major proof of Henryk's loyalty occurred after the death of his brother Przemko on 26 January 1289; his duchy of Scinawa was annexed by Henryk IV without protest from Henryk I-III. However, one year later, on 23 June 1290, Henryk IV 'Probus' died suddenly, probably poisoned, an event that seriously impacted on the future career of Henryk I-III. In his will, the dying Henryk IV left Henryk as his main heir. However, the Wroclaw knights and burghers had other plans, and one month later (mid-July 1290) they forced Henryk to flee. The rebels invited Henryk V 'the Fat' of Legnica to become their new ruler. The reasons for the Wroclaw revolt are not known, but the harsh rule of Henryk I-III may have been a decisive factor. In any event, Henryk refused to accept this and promptly declared war on Henryk V.
     "Shortly after taking control of Wroclaw, Henryk V forced Henryk I-III to renounce all his claims to the disputed territories of Chojnów, Boleslawiec, Gosciszów, Nowogrodziec, Scinawa, Winsko, Syców, Uraz, Trzebnica, Milicz and Sadowel. However, Henryk I-III managed to recover Scinawa soon after.
     "Both sides quickly sought allies to support them in the war. Henryk I-III made a treaty with the House of Wettin, strengthening this alliance by marrying Matilde von Braunschweig, the daughter of Albrecht I 'the Great', Herzog von Braunschweig, and his second wife Alessina de Monferrato. Other allies were Otto IV 'mit dem Pfeil', Markgraf von Brandenburg, and Przemyslaw II, duke of Poland. With the latter Henryk entered into an arrangement under which, if Przemyslaw died without male issue, Henryk would inherit his lands. In the mean time, Henryk V obtained the support of King Wenceslaus II of Bohemia.
     "Henryk and Matilde had nine children of whom two daughters and two of their five sons would have progeny.
     "Henryk V's rule over Wroclaw was conservative and created some political opponents among the nobility. One of them, Pakoslaw Zdzieszyca, was sentenced to death, accused of murder. The revenge of Pakoslaw's son Lutka was decisive for the struggle between the Henryks; on 11 November 1293 he captured Henryk V and gave him to Henryk I-III, who put him in an iron cage for almost six months. Henryk V only obtained his freedom after surrendering the towns of Namyslów, Bierutów, Olesnica, Kluczbork, Byczyna, Wolczyn, Olesno, Chojnówe and Boleslawiec (almost one third of the former lands of Henryk IV 'Probus) with their fortresses, paying a ransom of 30,000 pieces of silver and promising to assist Henryk I-III for the following five years in all his wars.
     "On 8 February 1296 Przemyslaw II, duke of Poland and since 1295 king of Poland, was murdered. The Greater Poland-Glogów alliance had already collapsed around 1293, when Przemyslaw II allied with Wladislaw Lokietek, duke of Kujawien (Kuyavia). The nobility of Greater Poland now chose Wladislaw Lokietek to succeed Przemyslaw II, despite the claims of Henryk I-III, who considered that the treaty signed with Przemyslaw II in 1290 was still valid, and that consequently he was Przemyslaw's sole heir.
     "Henryk and Wladislaw Lokietek quickly reached a settlement on 10 March 1296 in Krzywin, under which Henryk obtained all the lands south of the Obra River. At the same time Wladislaw designated Henryk's eldest son Henryk II-IV 'the Faithful' as his heir to Poznan and, in case of his death without male issue, to all of Greater Poland. Henryk's generous concessions to Wladislaw Lokietek in the treaty of 1296 were largely because he had already been defeated by Bolko I 'the Strict' von Schlesien, Herzog von Jauer und Schweidnitz. While Henryk was in Krzywin, Bolko I took Chojnów and Boleslawiec. Through the mediation of King Wenceslaus II of Bohemia a settlement was reached at Zwanowice in March 1297; Henryk managed to negotiate a truce with Bolko, but was forced to renounce these territories.
     "By the end of the 1290s Henryk managed to improve his relations with King Wenceslaus II of Bohemia (he was present in Prague for Wenceslaus II's coronation in 1297), but his relations with Wladislaw Lokietek had deteriorated to the point of war between them. In June 1298 in Koscian (and despite the opposition of the Greater Poland nobility led by the bishop of Poznan), Henryk I-III and Wladislaw Lokietek signed a new treaty under which, in return for confirmation of the role of the Church and the inclusion in the future 'Kingdom' of the position of Chancellor for himself, Henryk promised assistance to Wladislaw to help him to complete the total subjugation of Greater Poland, Gdansk and Pomerania, and so to obtain the Royal crown. The conflict between the Piast dukes was used by King Wenceslaus II. In the village of Kleka on 23 August 1299 an agreement was concluded under which Henryk I-III was forced to abandon his claims to Greater Poland for good.
     "Henryk immediately accepted the intervention of the Bohemian king because he was preoccupied in his own duchy by his disputes with the bishop of Wroclaw, Jan Romka. The conflict was over the duchy of Zagan, which had previously belonged to Henryk's younger brother Konrad II but was taken by Henryk in March 1299 when Konrad II was chosen as Patriarch of Aquileia. However, when Konrad II returned to Zagan, Henryk had no wish to return the duchy to him, which had been under Henryk's rule during his absence. Even after the intervention of the vassals and the Church, Henryk refused to give Konrad his duchy. Bishop Jan Romka excommunicated Henryk and supported Konrad. The fight with the Church was only resolved on 24 April 1300, and confirmed the victory of the bishop and the restitution of Zagan to Konrad.
     "Henryk had no intention of surrendering his claim to the Greater Poland inheritance, as evidenced in 1301 when he adopted the title 'Heir of the Polish Kingdom, Duke of Silesia, Glogów and Poznan.' This gave every prospect of armed conflict with the king of Bohemia and now of Poland, Wenceslaus II. However, despite the delicate situation, war did not break out, largely because Wenceslaus was preoccupied attempting to obtain the Hungarian crown for his son. The death of Wenceslaus II in 1305 and the murder of his son and successor Wenceslaus III the following year favoured Henryk's ambitions in Greater Poland. The death of his brother Konrad II on 11 October 1304 further helped Henryk's situation, as he was able to annex Konrad's duchy of Zagan and reunite the whole duchy of Glogów under his rule.
     "In the spring of 1306 Henryk was able to advance over the border into Greater Poland, Gdansk and Pomerania, forcing Wladislaw I Lokietek to retreat. Kalisz resisted Henryk, but he was able to capture it in 1307 from its ruler, Boleslaw III 'the Generous', duke of Breslau, Liegnitz and Brieg (the eldest son of Henryk V 'the Fat'), who also had a claim over the succession to Wenceslaus II (as the husband of his youngest daughter Margarete of Bohemia). Eventually all of Greater Poland was taken by Henryk. He soon formed an alliance with the new king of Bohemia, Heinrich VI, Herzog von Kärnten, against Boleslaw III's ambitious plans.
     "In his internal policies, Henryk was largely able to keep his duchy clear of the wars in which he was constantly involved, and in consequence the economy grew and with it the prestige and wealth of Glogów. Henryk also introduced administrative and monetary reforms which benefitted not only the townspeople but also his own court and the nobility. He also founded more than a dozen urban centres.
     "In his relations with the Church, Henryk was a generous benefactor. Several monasteries and churches were founded during his rule. He was a patron of many artists, which is reflected in the beautiful tombstones for Henryk IV 'Probus', Boleslaw I 'the Tall', his brothers and parents, in the Glogów collegiate church, and of Przemyslaw II in Poznan Cathedral.
     "Henryk I-III died on 9 December 1309 and was buried in the Cistercian church of Lubiaz. His five sons soon split the inheritance from their father between them, which led to the decline of the duchy. The resulting fragmentation, especially in the Greater Poland region, was not welcomed by the local nobility, who were concerned for their positions. In the end, Wladislaw Lokeitek was able to conquer all of Greater Poland in 1314.
     "In his will Henryk left his wife Glogów as her widow's seat, which she ruled until her own death in 1319."¹⁰

Reference: Genealogics cites:

; Per Med Lands:
     "HEINRICH von Glogau, son of KONRAD I Duke of Glogau [Piast] & his first wife Salomea of Poland [Piast] ([1251/60]-[7/9] Dec 1309, bur Kloster Lüben). The Chronicon Polono-Silesiacum names (in order) "Conrado Stinaviense, Henrico Glogoviense et Primisline Sprotaviense ducellis" as sons of "Conradus Glogoviense" & his first wife[233]. He succeeded his father in 1274 as HEINRICH I Duke of Glogau. Heinrich IV "Probus" Duke of Breslau, Prince of Krakow appointed Heinrich his successor in Breslau in 1290, but the townspeople refused to grant him possession and forced him to cede Breslau to Heinrich Duke of Liegnitz[234]. In the succeeding years, Heinrich gained control over Greater Poland, although there was local opposition to his rule and after his death his sons were unable to maintain their position there[235]. The Epytaphia ducum Slezie record the death "1309 5 Id Dec" of "Heynricus dux Glogowie, filius Cunradi", specifying that he was buried in Lüben[236].
     "m (May 1291) MECHTILD von Braunschweig, daughter of ALBRECHT "der Große" Herzog von Braunschweig und Lüneburg & his second wife Alessina di Monferrato ([1276]-[26 Apr/31 Aug] 1318, bur Glogau). The Chronica Principum Brunsvicensium names "duci Glogovie" as husband of "Mechtildis [filia Alberti]" and their marriage "1291 mense Maio"[237]. The Chronica principum Polonie records that "Heinrico Glogoviensis" married "Mechtildim filiam Alberti ducis Brunswicensis", adding that she was buried "in Glogovia"[238]. The Epytaphia ducum Slezie name "Mechtildam, filiam ducis de Brunzwik" as wife of "Heynricus dux Glogowie", specifying that she was buried in Lüben[239]."
Med Lands cites:

; Per Med Lands:
     "MECHTILD von Braunschweig ([1276]-[26 Apr/31 Aug] 1318, bur Glogau). The Chronica Principum Brunsvicensium names (in order) "Henricum, Albertum, Wilhelmum, Conradum, Othonem, Luderum et Mechtildem" as children of "Albertus" & his second wife[150]. The Chronica Principum Brunsvicensium names "duci Glogovie" as husband of "Mechtildis [filia Alberti]" and their marriage "1291 mense Maio"[151]. The Chronica principum Polonie records that "Heinrico Glogoviensis" married "Mechtildim filiam Alberti ducis Brunswicensis", adding that she was buried "in Glogovia"[152]. The Epytaphia ducum Slezie name "Mechtildam, filiam ducis de Brunzwik" as wife of "Heynricus dux Glogowie", specifying that she was buried in Lüben[153].
     "m (May 1291) HEINRICH I Duke of Glogau, son of KONRAD I Duke of Glogau [Piast] & his first wife Salomea of Poland [Piast] ([1251/60]-[7/9] Dec 1309, bur Kloster Leubus)."
Med Lands cites: He was Duke of Glogau between 1274 and 1309.^2,9 He was Duke of ?cinawa between 1290 and 1309.⁹ He was Duke of Ole?nica between 1294 and 1309.⁹ He was Duke of ?aga? Between 1304 and 1309.⁹ He was Duke of Namys?ów between 1304 and 1309.⁹ He was Duke of Sagan between 1304 and 1310.² He was Duke of Kalisz between 1305 and 1306.⁹ He was Duke of Gniezno between 1305 and 1309.⁹ He was Duke of Greater Poland between 1305 and 1309.⁹ He was Duke of Pozna? Between 1305 and 1309.⁹ He was Great Duke of Poland between 1306 and 1310.² He was Duke of Kalisz between 1307 and 1309.⁹